Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another


A View of the New Egypt

Likely future president paints a country more hostile to Israeli interests

Print Email
Amr Moussa in March.(PIERRE VERDY/AFP/Getty Images)

Those who feared that former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak’s ouster would make life less easy for Israel can find plenty of ammunition in the recent events. Egypt’s new foreign policy is seeing it draw closer to Iran and Hamas (it was Cairo, after all, that brokered the Hamas-Fatah reconciliation deal), two of Israel’s biggest enemies. Egyptian natural gas—Israel recently was getting as much as 40 percent of its natural gas from Egypt—will become more expensive and more scarce when you combine sabotage with domestic political pressure both to renege on a 2005 deal that is widely seen (probably accurately) as corrupt and simply to halt the flow of energy to a country many Egyptians don’t particularly like. And, in an interview, the likely next president of Egypt, Amr Moussa—who is not himself an Islamist, unlike the members of the Muslim Brotherhood who are likely to win a substantial share of the next parliament—said several things that many Israelis and Israeli supporters may find troubling. To wit:

• “The view that Hamas is a terrorist organization is a view that pertains to a minority of countries, not a majority. Being a terrorist is not a stigma forever.”

• “Iran is not the natural enemy of Arabs, and it shouldn’t be. We have a lot to gain by peaceful relations—or less tense relations—with Iran.”

• “The nuclear issue in the Middle East means Israel and then Iran.”

• “Egypt conducted its relations in the region in a way that the people did not accept. Egyptian-Arab relations is one thing; the Palestinian question is another. … Blocking Gaza and enforcing the siege along Gaza—people didn’t like that. We should have insisted and used Egyptian-Palestinian relations to try and … put an end to the siege that caused a lot of suffering to the people of Gaza. The whole world has said exactly what I am saying—that the siege has to come to an end. The old regime was not of the same view.”

On the other hand, he also makes this interesting point: “The most flagrant violation was the issue of succession,” he says of the Mubarak regime. He adds, “Had there been no revolution in January, it would have happened in May or June, when the regime would have announced the candidacy of Mubarak’s son Gamal. Nobody would have accepted that.” In other words: The “stability” that a cooperative Mubarak regime provided Israel was something of a chimera, in that it was fated to end; by implication, the only true stability between Israel and Egypt will be one in which the Egyptian people feel they have a stake and have had their say, and we are closer to such a future than we were when Mubarak was still president.

Egypt’s New Foreign Policy Tests Old Alliances [LAT]
“Being a Terrorist Is Not a Stigma Forever” [Slate]
Earlier: Sabotage Foreshadows Israel’s Energy Future

Print Email

Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

Talk is cheap. Iran and its Arab neighbors aren’t adversaries? Sure. Hamas isn’t a problem, and the gates of Gaza should be flung open? Wait until Hamas and their allies go after the president, which is coming sooner or later, even if they profess to be uninterested in politics. Corruption surrounding energy contracts is going to end? O–kay, Amr. They’re not going to sell natural gas to Israel? Who are they going to sell it to? Saudi Arabia? Iran? Iraq? And if Moussa does nab the presidency, let’s see how quickly he’s willing to hold free elections.

It is an odd but persistent feature of politics that in the wake of an epic struggle to dislodge a dictator from the levers of power, a newly enfranchised people will freely elect someone apt to be just as corrupt.

Genuinely enlightening many thanks, It looks like your current subscribers may very well want further articles like this keep up the great content.


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

A View of the New Egypt

Likely future president paints a country more hostile to Israeli interests

More on Tablet:

Obama: Denying Israel’s Right to Exist as a Jewish Homeland is Anti-Semitic

By Yair Rosenberg — The president draws a line in the sand in his latest interview