Clinton Airbrushed Out of Second Publication
Modesty policy ‘in no way relegates’ women, says one
Der Tzitung was not the only Hasidic newspaper to airbrush Secretary of State Clinton out of the famed Situation Room photograph (a doing that was widely aired yesterday, though Tablet Magazine was a bit early to the party, linking to it last Friday). Brooklyn-based De Voch, a glossy weekly for the ultra-Orthodox, also did it, reports Failed Messiah. Ben Smith finds an instance in which Laura Bush was airbrushed out of a photo in Mishpacha magazine (which is now what Tablet Magazine should be renamed). And columnist Michelle Goldberg calls out the practice for what it indeed seems to be.
Speaking of which, Der Tzitung‘s full explanation is pretty epic. The Hasidic community, after all, embraced Clinton when she was New York’s senator for the better part of last decade. “In accord with our religious beliefs,” it explained, “we do not publish photos of women, which in no way relegates them to a lower status.” (Hrmm.) It added, “Because of laws of modesty, we are not allowed to publish pictures of women, and we regret if this gives an impression of disparaging to women, which is certainly never our intention. We apologize if this was seen as offensive.”
Another Hasidic Publication Photoshops Hillary Clinton Out Of Iconic Photo [Failed Messiah]
Related: Hillary Clinton, Audrey Tomason Go Missing in Situation Room Photo in Der Tzitung Newspaper [WP]
Oops! Sorry For Erasing Hillary [Daily Beast]
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.