Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another

thescroll_header

Pressure Mounts for German Documents

‘Don’t mention the war,’ say some

Print Email
Adolf Eichmann in Jerusalem.()

In recognition of the 50th anniversary of the trial of Adolf Eichmann in Israel, Der Spiegel brought much new to light, including further details on just how much Eichmann regretted not being able to have killed even more Jews. (Well, I mean, you gotta reach for the stars. However, there is still controversy in Germany over the refusal of the BND (its equivalent of the CIA) to release several thousand documents related to West German knowledge of Eichmann’s whereabouts—as early as 1952, they were aware he was living with his family under an assumed name in Argentina—as well as, well, certain things we don’t know about because the documents remain classified. It turns out that while Germany is famously, and admirably, eager about confronting itself during the Nazi years, it is much more hesitant when it comes to postwar West Germany, which, in the very same mythology that right states that Nazism was an abomination, sees postwar West Germany as a brave alternative to the Communist East (true) and as a time of reckoning with and even purification of the country’s Nazi past (somewhat true, somewhat false).

It is actually surprisingly easy to sympathize with Germans who may, at this point, want the whole thing put finally to rest. But murder will out, as they say, and so will this.

50 Years After Trial, Eichmann Secrets Live On [NYT]
Related: The Eichmann Trial [Nextbook Press]
Earlier: Regrets, He Had a Few

Print Email

COMMENTING CHARGES
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at letters@tabletmag.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

It’s my sense of Germany, especially Berlin, that they have pummeled themselves with attempts to apologize, and make amends for the Holocaust. I certainly can’t blame them for not wanting to do any more apologizing.

But it is interesting that only in Dresden did I get the feeling that the war punished them enough. The bombing of Dresden apparently wiped out any need for reparations, momuments, and memorials.

I’ve written about my trip to Germany as a Jew visiting Jewish sites. Let’s say, it changed my view of Germany.

2000

Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

Pressure Mounts for German Documents

‘Don’t mention the war,’ say some

More on Tablet:

Cruelty & Perversity: Postprandial Reflections on the PEN Protesters

By Paul Berman — The grim satire of the ‘Charlie Hebdo’ controversy, in context