Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another


Diplomats’ Report: Deal Could Prove Useful

Foreign ministry suggests Israel work jiu-jitsu on reconciliation

Print Email
P.A. President Abbas (L) and Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal (R) in Cairo today.(PPM via Getty Images)

I’ll take fuller stock tomorrow of today’s consummation of the Fatah-Hamas reconciliation deal, once the dust has settled slightly. For now, though, it is worth considering the contents of a report prepared by career diplomats (which is to say, not Yisrael Beiteinu political appointees) in Israel’s foreign ministry. Haaretz reports this paper is crystal-clear about the “security threat” posed by reconciliation—bringing at it does the potential for a renewed Hamas presence in the West Bank and for Fatah to radicalize to match its new ally—but also the potential “strategic opportunity to create genuine change in the Palestinian context” in “the long-term interests for Israel.”

Haaretz leads with the contradiction between the report and Prime Minister Netanyahu’s public statements, which have been adamant that Fatah, in choosing to make peace with Hamas, has chosen not to make peace with Israel. But actually, the two are not necessarily inconsistent. The report seems to acknowledge that this is what Fatah has done.

Yet instead of shutting diplomacy down, it sees Fatah’s decision as a chance, first, to “sharpen the dilemma on the Palestinian side,” and, second, to gain international respect and, more crucially, make it easier for the United States to go to bat for it as September’s U.N. General Assembly—at which the Palestinians are threatening to try for recognition of independence—approaches. “Israel must be a team player and coordinate its response to a Palestinian unity government with the administration,” the report argues, according to Haaretz (“the administration” being that of President Obama). “This will empower the United States and serve Israeli interests.” Given that the Obama administration’s most recent U.N. action related to Israel was a veto of a Security Council resolution condemning settlements, it is only logical for Israel to do what it can to strengthen the U.S. hand.

The deal is possibly very bad for Israel, the report seems to be saying, but it has happened, and the best thing Israel can do is try to shape it to its advantage—by sending a delegation to Cairo and by continuing to cooperate on security with Fatah—and, by acknowledging it (however begrudgingly), try to stave off the broader international movement that is against the Jewish state’s interests. You can wish this deal had never gone down (which it just did), and you can wish it will self-implode under the weight of its own contradictions (which remains quite possible), but, as always, wishing won’t make it so.

Palestinian Factions Sign Pact to End Rift [NYT]
Israel Foreign Ministry Views Hamas-Fatah Deal Differently Than Netanyahu [Haaretz]
Earlier: Fatah Chooses Hamas

Print Email

Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

Graphic Commentaries on the Middle East

editrix says:

“bringing at it does the potential for a renewed Hamas presence in the West Bank and for Fatah to radicalize to match its new ally—”

Paging the copyeditor. What the heck does this clause mean?

Forest says:

Can I make a suggestion–Learn Hebrew and read the Hebrew language press in Israel. Haaretz is way out there on the left, has columnists such as Amira Haas who are openly anti-zionist and does not seek to hide its agenda. Anything they write is suspect. They also do not reflect the views of the average Israeli and their circulation is way down.


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

Diplomats’ Report: Deal Could Prove Useful

Foreign ministry suggests Israel work jiu-jitsu on reconciliation

More on Tablet:

How to Protect the Conversion Process

By Tzipi Sutin — My friend was recorded in a mikveh by a rabbi. Let’s ensure the end of this abuse of power.