Hasids on Bikes
Why was prison-bar mitzvah chaplain meeting with City Hall?
Last Thursday, the New York Post broke the story of Tuvia Stern, an ultra-Orthodox inmate at the Manhattan lockup known as the Tombs, who somehow managed to host a kosher bar mitzvah reception for his son and some 60 guests in the prison gymnasium. In the days since, the Post and other city dailies have breathlessly reported on the fallout—and written some delicious headlines in the process (“Bars Mitzvah,” “Bagels and Locks,” “Kosher Kings”). Today’s stories focus on Leib Glanz, the prison chaplain and Satmar Hasid who seems to have made the party possible. He has resigned (“RAB-BYE,” screamed the Post), but the plot continues to thicken. Today’s Times reports that official calendars show three meetings between Glanz and deputy mayor Kevin Sheekey in the closing months of 2008. Asked what the meetings were about, the mayor’s chief spokesman, Stu Loeser, cited what the Times calls “community issues.” Like the creation of bike lanes on the Brooklyn waterfront, he said.
Now, as anyone who has tried to ride a bike while wearing an ankle-length caftan can attest, Hasidim are not big cyclists. If Glanz was indeed talking about bike lanes with the mayor’s office, it wasn’t about creating them, as the mayor’s office seems to be suggesting, but keeping them outside an ultra-Orthodox enclave. Scantily clad cyclists were making the community uncomfortable, Hasidic leaders told the Post last fall.
Rerouting the flow of civic life in order to satisfy the demands of an influential splinter group—sounds like the recipe for a jailhouse bar mitzvah.
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.