Rosenberg Son Admits Father’s Guilt
If just barely
Sixty years after his parents Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were convicted of espionage and sentenced to death, Robert Meeropol, a lawyer, for the first time publicly acknowledged that his father “was guilty of conspiracy to commit espionage.” It is worth sitting with that for a second—perhaps the final wall of denial to fall in a case that has obsessed the American Jewish community for six decades—before getting to all of what Meeropol won’t admit, which continues to be prodigious. He attributed the admission to a recent Weekly Standard article that contained further revelations of atomic secrets Julius Rosenberg passed to the Soviet Union.
The co-author of that article, Ron Radosh, published a lengthy piece last month in Tablet Magazine exploring why some continue to deny or extenuate over the charges against Julius—who was a spy—and Ethel—who at the least knew of her husband’s activities. Some of this hesitance stems from an honest place: Despite their (and particularly Julius’s) actual guilt, there were several irregularities about the trial. But most of it, especially today, Radosh persuasively argues, stems from the far left’s desire “to maintain their view that the only guilty party was the United States.”
And so to Meeropol, who also said, “The F.B.I., the Justice Department and Judge Kaufman were guilty of a much more serious conspiracy than any my father was involved in,” and has recently written,
Ethel was not a spy and Julius was ignorant of the atomic bomb project. They were innocent of stealing the secret of the atomic bomb and they were fighting for their lives. It would have been next to impossible for them to explain to their children and supporters the subtle distinction between not being guilty of stealing atomic secrets and blanket innocence. Given that, I can understand the course of action they took from a political standpoint.
Rosenberg Son Says Father Was Guilty of Spy Charge [City Room]
Related: Cold Case [Tablet Magazine]
The Sobell Confession [The Weekly Standard]
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.