Rabbi Sizomu Loses Election, Alleges Rigging
Dispatch from Uganda
NABUGOYE, UGANDA—By 5 pm Friday, voting in Uganda’s general election was coming to a close. In Nabugoye, where voting had taken place on the hillside below Moses Synagogue, some shouting ensued. Agents for MP Yahaya Gudoi Wojje, the incumbent, wanted to know why more voters were being allowed in, while supporters of the main opposition candidate, Rabbi Gershom Sizomu, shouted back that electoral commission rules clearly state that people in line on the hour must be permitted to cast their ballots. Nabugoye is Sizomu’s turf, and once all those who wished to vote had done so, the presiding officer ceremoniously dumped the ballots out onto a black plastic tarp that had come with the official kit, in full view of the assembled Abayudayah Jewish community and other local residents who wished to keep watch on the tally. In his home parish, Sizomu won handily, taking 353 votes to Wojje’s 50.
But how had he done in toss-up Bukonde, and more importantly in Wojje’s largely Muslim stronghold on the north side of the district? Reports of intimidation, harassment, and rigging, which had been filtering up to Sizomu’s campaign headquarters all day, had shaken the confidence of the Jewish candidate—likely the first and only native-born black African rabbi—who during the week leading up to the elections had repeatedly made clear his fear of foul play from the ruling party, to which both Wojje and frontrunning President Yoweri Museveni belong.
In the morning, a man was driven up to Nabugoye in a car, so that his skinned elbow could be shown to Sizomu as well as to me, and so that he could describe the fight he had been in the night before in Mbale, the provincial center. The worst complaints, though, came from Wojje’s sub-district: There, word had it, a pair of Sizomu’s officially sanctioned election observers had been chased from their posts, beaten, and harassed, in order that ballots could be altered.
Late that night, Sizomu disappeared into the Mbale Town Council building, which was the election counting center for the region; when he emerged Saturday afternoon, he looked distressed. Many of his supporters, as well as those of his opponent, were stationed on the sidewalk opposite a full deployment of riot troops in blue camouflage and a battalion of khaki-clad local police waving clubs. A reporter for the local tabloid showed me an image he had taken of a Ugandan colleague who had been shot in the stomach in nearby Sironko for refusing to hand over his camera to a ruling-party bodyguard. Up the street, the Indian merchants had kept their shops closed and locked down behind grating, wanting nothing to do with what many feared would be a violent reaction if the opposition’s claims of widespread election-rigging were borne out.
By 11 am, national television networks covering the count were reporting the “late arrival” of three Wojje-territory ballot boxes to the commission’s offices. The news anchor went so far as to ask his analyst, “This is probably vote rigging, no? Ballot boxes arriving 24 hours after polls open?” Even providing for “potholes” and “transport breakdowns,” it seemed impossible that such a delivery could be on the up-and-up. “We are not in a free condition!” a woman complained to me as we watched the three black boxes enter the Council building. The crowd of agitated observers were kept at bay by the threat of a water canon. I asked a campaign worker what he felt the rabbi’s prospects were. “With HaShem,” he said, “anything is possible.”
In the late afternoon, Wojje was declared the winner of the contest for Bungokho North’s parliamentary seat: 16,744 votes to Sizomu’s 14,872. Turnout was lower than expected, and Sizomu supporters immediately said that voters had been intimidated. (All of the 50 or so voters I briefly interviewed at a dozen polling stations said they had voted freely, and the electoral commission’s regional supervisor, Eric Wamanga, denied that anything had been abnormal in the voting.) Sizomu said right away that he was going to contest the results, which had Wojje taking 95 percent of the votes in one sub-district, a figure that seemed unnaturally inflated in Wojje’s favor.
Sizomu says that his agents counted 324 votes in one polling station, but the official tally there came to only 21. In another parish, he claimed he got 210 votes and tallied zero. “Votes were stuffed, and our staff were beaten and hospitalized,” he said. Back in Nabugoye that night, one of Sizomu’s campaign workers took off his shirt to display bruising on his back, which he said had been the result of being beaten by Wojje supporters while trying to do his job as an observer in Yewa Trading Center.
When I found Wojje in his sub-district, he, too, insisted there had been foul play and that his supporters had been beaten. Then he pulled his son out of the back seat of their car and had him show me a three-pronged scratch mark on his back that, Wojje said, had been caused by people trying to “send a message from my opponents.” He refused to elaborate further on the cause of the wound, as did his son.
Sizomu has since sent his workers to make statements to the Mbale police. That material will join other evidence he is gathering for his lawyer, who will submit the complaint to Uganda’s Constitutional Court. Sizomu says this is his first and last resort in the matter, save for a promise to run again in five years. “My supporters know that I was the winner, and the other guy used force,” he said. “Some of the police and the military were behind ballot-stuffing, to keep Museveni’s party in parliament. We are very disappointed. Many people in this constituency feel like their votes were stolen.”
Plus Qaddafi threatened, Bahrain’s ambassador, and more in the news
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.