GOP and AIPAC At Odds Over Foreign Aid
Proposed budget cuts pit Republicans against pro-Israel group
We established last week that the desire to cut foreign aid to Israel is limited to a very small fringe in the Republican Party. However, as part of a broader plan to lower deficits by cutting federal spending, the GOP has proposed altering President Obama’s budget to cut foreign assistance spending. And even that has been opposed from a coalition that includes AIPAC and that warns, “The proposed cut would gut our embassies and consulates, and hurt our commitment to key allies in the Middle East.” The GOP claims the proposal would cut this budget by four percent, while the coalition claims it is more like 13 percent.
The larger principle that obtains, according to AIPAC and its allies, is that U.S. international engagement generally is good for U.S. support for Israel, and a pullback from that engagement is bad (we saw this also when AIPAC came down against Majority Leader Eric Cantor’s since-retracted suggestion to separate Israeli foreign aid from other foreign aid; “a robust foreign aid budget is a strong signal of U.S. leadership around the globe,” AIPAC said at the time).
According to JTA, AIPAC has been even more direct in private meetings with Republican officials. “AIPAC sees foreign assistance as a package that benefits the U.S.-Israel alliance,” the news service reports.
Noshing challah, Knicks star is the quintessential New Yorker
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.