Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another


AJC Dismisses Snyder’s Anti-Semitism Charge

And Floyd Abrams calls suit ‘ludicrous on its face’

Print Email
The allegedly offending image.(WCP)

The football season may be over, but the battle for free speech and journalism against bullying petty tyrants who compound their evildoing by inappropriately playing the anti-Semitism card may never be. Washington Post city columnist Courtland Milloy gets the American Jewish Committee’s director of anti-Semitism to note that, out of Washington Redskins owner Dan Snyder; the Washington City Paper’s brilliant November takedown of Snyder; and Snyder’s subsequent lawsuit against the paper and claim that its cover illustration was anti-Semitic, the only offensive thing is the team name.

In other Snyder news, New York Times media columnist David Carr—a former WCP editor—reporting that prominent First Amendment lawyer Floyd Abrams will be working for the defendant. “This litigation is so self-evidently lacking in merit and so ludicrous on its face that it is difficult to imagine that it was commenced for any reason but to seek to intimidate,” Abrams says. An investigation of the complaint itself by TBD—WCP’s main rival—confirmed this.

Here is where I mention that WCP has established a legal defense fund for the case, and that any extra proceeds from it will be donated to D.C. charities. Something to consider throwing money at if you wish to take a stand against a little dictator besmirching the very real legacy of anti-Semitism to satisfy the needs of his damaged ego.

Snyder’s Devil Is in the Details—And a Name [WP]
Ridiculed, an NFL Owner Goes to Court [NYT]
Dan Snyder Lawsuit: A Complete Analysis [TBD]
Related: The Cranky Redskins Fan’s Guide to Dan Snyder [WCP]

Print Email

Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

Mike Shapiro says:

This is a fairly typical SLAPP lawsuit. The irony here is that is most often used by Islamic organizations against people and/or small groups that may criticize, satirize, or somehow disturb those who profess that religion.


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

AJC Dismisses Snyder’s Anti-Semitism Charge

And Floyd Abrams calls suit ‘ludicrous on its face’

More on Tablet:

Facing Death

By Jenny Diski — ‘I don’t believe in you, “salvation,” I never have and I never will. And very soon I won’t even be.’