Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another


GOP Mostly Undivided on Israel

But maybe a little divided on Egypt?

Print Email
Pastor John Hagee last year.(Gali Tibbon/AFP/Getty Images)

When I wondered whether Sen. Rand Paul’s call for ending U.S. aid to Israel would trigger a GOP civil war between the Tea Party and the establishment, I neglected to consider a crucial element in the Republican coalition: The Christian right. Sure enough, it has weighed in, and sure enough, it is, as ever, a strong supporter of American support for Israel. Pastor John Hagee of Christians United for Israel—which Mideast columnist Lee Smith has profiledargued that most elements of the Tea Party do not stand with Paul. I’m not convinced that is true. I am, however, convinced that, more importantly, the Paul faction is vastly outnumbered in the GOP overall.

The far more interesting fissure on that side of the aisle right now is between neoconservatives like Elliott Abrams—also profiled by Smith—and Bill Kristol who are more or less supportive of the anti-Mubarak, pro-democracy protesters—they see the nascent revolution as the fulfillment of George W. Bush’s “Freedom Agenda” (though you could argue, as Matt Duss does, that that misrepresents what the Freedom Agenda actually was)—and Israel’s current right-wing government as well as other Israel supporters, who fear the form that Egyptian democracy will take. (Ben Smith and Josh Gerstein note that a few U.S. neocons, like John Bolton, take the Israeli position.) Reality: It’s messy!

Evangelicals Blast Paul on Israel [Ben Smith]
In Backing Change in Egypt, U.S. Neoconservatives Split With Israeli Allies [WP]
Hosni Mubarak Splits Israel from Neocon Supporters [Politico]
Related: Friends In Deed [Tablet Magazine]’
Rescuing Democracy Promotion from Cynics [Wonk Room]
The Shadow Viceroy [Tablet Magazine]
In the Streets of Cairo, Proof Bush Was Right [Outlook]
Earlier: Tea Party Senator Endorses End of Israeli Aid

Print Email

Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

A.L. Bell says:

Seriously: no matter how brutally realistic Israel is, it can’t be openly on the side of a government that sends in plainclothes policemen on camels to shoot unarmed protesters and rough up journalists.

Maybe Israel could make a tough love case for stability before the camel attacks, but if, at this point, Israel keeps on siding with the Evil Camel Riders over the protesters, then Israel will seriously be in competition with the president of Iran for The 2011 Grand Moff Tarkin Goon Awards.

The Palestinian situation is a tough situation, and the only choice Israel has there is to muddle through and pray for divine guidance.

But, in the case of Egypt, Israel still can choose to be on the side of good, or at least not on the side of evil. It should either be on the side of the protesters or emphatically neutral. It should definitely not be on the side of the Evil Camel Riders.

Frank Messmann says:

Egypt is not important to the strategic interests of the US.
But it is very important to Israel, because Israel does not have to defend its border with Egypt.

In other words, the strategic interests of the US and Israel differ, as is obvious to any objective person.

The US unfortunately sacrifices its own interests for Israel’s because of pressure from AIPAC and other “Israel first” groups.

That is the simple, unvarnished truth, but I know that it is hard for many to see that or to admit it.

BH in Iowa says:

Frank Messmann, the Suez Canal is of no strategic interest to the US?

Frank Messman, the U.S. has no strategic interest in 60 million people in the center of the middle East?

Neveragain says:

Messmann is right.Our solar powered cars, busses, trains and jets are the marvel of the world.
Now that the U.S. is totally self-sufficient regarding energy, we should just pull out of the middle east entirely.



Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

GOP Mostly Undivided on Israel

But maybe a little divided on Egypt?

More on Tablet:

A Tale of Three Twitter Feeds: Hamas Tweets in Arabic, English, and Hebrew

By Aaron Magid — Analysis of the social-media messaging of Hamas’ military wing reveals distinct voices for the West, the Arab Middle East, and Israel