Emanuel Ruled Ineligible To Be Mayor
Unusual decision comes a month before election
First the Bears, and now this! In a surprise and somewhat bizarre decision, a panel of an Illinois state appellate court ruled, 2-1, that former White House chief-of-staff Rahm Emanuel is ineligible to compete in Chicago’s mayoral election on February 22. In most polls, Emanuel is leading by a significant margin over five other candidates.
The two-judge majority, disagreeing with the Chicago Board of Elections, a trial judge, and the third judge on the panel, argued that a municipal code requiring candidates to have a year of residency is to be interpreted more or less literally, and therefore that Emanuel’s return last autumn failed to qualify him. The opposing argument, according to election law expert Rick Hasen, is that residency is a question of intention, and since Emanuel always intended to return to Chicago—and departed in order to run the office of the leader of the free world—he is eligible to run.
Hasen, who spoke briefly on the phone with me, predicted that the Illinois Supreme Court would overturn today’s decision—if it gets to decide it in time. “The dissent, which is very strongly worded, accuses the majority of ignoring precedent and coming up with a new standard just to apply in this case,” Hasen said. “It’s already clear to me from what I’ve read that if this is a close case, most courts are likely to read the statute to give Chicago voters a chance to vote the candidate they want in a competitive election.”
Which, Hasen argued, is as it should be: “Given that there’s ample precedent to reach that conclusion, given that the election board and numerous other bodies reached the conclusion that Emanuel is eligible, then if there’s a way to do that, voters should be given that choice.”
In Tablet Magazine, Rachel Shteir argues that even if Emanuel wins his appeal in timely fashion, “it may not matter”: “If the Illinois Supreme Court rules in his favor, he’s a master of the dark arts who used his money and political pull to get back in the race. In the mean time, he’s been legally certified as a carpetbagger, which gives political cover to all those who—for whatever reasons—have labeled him an outsider.” Shteir has already predicted that Emanuel is likely not to win due to subtle, vestigial anti-Semitic bias in the Windy City.
Court Says Emanuel Is Not Eligible to Run for Chicago Mayor [NYT]
Related: House of Blues [Tablet Magazine]
Out of the Loop [Tablet Magazine]
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.