Palin Likely Didn’t Know ‘Blood Libel’ Meaning
And other opinions on the latest brouhaha
The Obama administration has no comment on Sarah Palin’s invocation of the phrase “blood libel” to describe those who would link strident right-wing rhetoric to the tragic Tucson shooting. Fortunately, absolutely no one else has been so reticent.
I’ll briefly say that I’ve been persuaded that Palin may well have been unaware of the phrase’s origins—I have been surprised to hear how many people, Jews included, did not know its provenance as the myth that the Jews kill Gentile babies and use their blood to make Passover matzah. Palin was most likely responding to the phrase’s presence in right-wing circles to describe other things. However, and as contributing editor Jeffrey Goldberg predicted at the outset of the controversy, everybody has since learned all about it: This was definitely, as they say, a teaching moment. (The Times even ran a handy primer.) Palin can plausibly claim that she was unaware of the hurt she was causing when she made her video before Wednesday morning; she cannot claim, however, that she is not cognizant of it now. It would be totally consistent for her, therefore, to regret her choice of phrase. I’m not holding my breath. Anyway, here is what everyone else has to say:
• James Besser notes that “blood libel” is frequently directed, particularly in Israel, against those who criticize the Jewish state. “Before we criticize,” he argues, “we should clean up our own house.” [The Political Insider]
• Plenty more groups and plenty more people had plenty more to say. [JTA]
• One group that came to the former governor’s defense was, unsurprisingly, Jews for Sarah. Yet it turns out its Website uses a foreign domain name, effectively hiding who is behind it. [Failed Messiah]
• Alan Dershowitz defends her. [Big Government]
• Pat Buchanan says her use of the phrase was “excellent.” [TPM]
• Rabbi Shmuley Boteach defends her. [WSJ]
• Rabbi Andy Bachman, whom I have always preferred to Rabbi Boteach anyway, has a much wiser take. [Water Over Rocks]
• The phrase (in this context) may have originated with the (Jewish) conservative commentator Andrew Breitbart. [SF Gate]
• Finally, go learn something: The Yeshiva University Museum, in Manhattan, has an exhibit, called Zero to Ten, that has original documents from the 1475 Trial of the Jews of Trent, in which the blood libel—the actual blood libel—was invoked. [YU Museum]
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.