Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another


Getting a Divorce vs. Getting a Get

Civil and religious lines cross for one couple

Print Email
A ketubah, or Jewish marriage certificate.(Hanson Switzky/Flickr)

Tablet Magazine contributing editor Mark Oppenheimer has a column today sure to climb near the top of the New York Times Most E-Mailed list. It is about the dissolution of the marriage of Aharon Friedman, a prominent Republican tax-policy specialist on Capitol Hill, and Tamar Epstein. Both Orthodox Jews, though they are civilly divorced, Friedman refuses to grant Epstein a get, which would free either one to remarry under Jewish law.

The catalyst for Friedman’s untypical refusal is that a Baltimore beit din, or rabbinic court, was still deliberating when a civil custody ruling granted Friedman visitation with their three-year-old daughter only three times per month, with two of these times being outside Philadelphia (where Epstein now lives) from Friday evening to Sunday—which, given that Friedman is Orthodox and lives in Washington, D.C., effectively means on Sunday only. Friedman is reportedly angry with this ruling.

Brooklyn-based Rabbi Yisroel Belsky is persuasive when he argues, “The court decided in a bullheaded way not to respect the Shabbos.”

And Rabbi Jonathan Reiss was also persuasive when he argued, without reference to this particular case, “Even if one party acts wrongly to the other, it is never correct either for the husband to withhold a get or for the wife to refuse a get when a marriage is clearly over.”

Religious Divorce Dispute Leads to Secular Protest [NYT]

Print Email

Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

Ms. Epstein could solve her problems if she allowed the father a better custody/visitation arrangement. But it seems she does not want that – maybe she even does not want him in his daughter’s life?

Instead of taking responsibility for her actions and the consequences thereof, she wants to blame him. She is only an agunah because she refuses to make the changes in the custody. He is using the only leverage he has. I applaud him for standing up for his relationship with his daughter!

“He is using the only leverage he has.”

Of course this begs the question: What leverage does she have?

Lisa Kaiser says:

He needs to grow up and go ahead and provide her with the get.

Seems like both parties could do things to work this out. He could to get to Philly early in the day. And why can he not visit with daughter on Sahbbat? Seems like taking care of her on Shabbat is parenting–just like all Orthodox parents take care of their young children on Shabbat.

And yes, she could be more flexible re visitation times-more often during the month.

Everybody loses in this kind of situation.

shualah elisheva says:

everybody loses – but the child especially loses.

Seems the husband is in no rush to remarry. I strongly disagree with Rabbi Belsky. The couple hired lawyers and took their case to secular court.

Now the loser husband is unhappy with the decision, so he is using the get as his Plan B.

[url=]casino[/url] [url=]casino online[/url] [url=]adult toys[/url] [url=]casino[/url] [url=]SMS[/url]

Ethan Halpern says:

To whom it may concern:
It appears the father / husband is not the villan afterall. If Epstein has moved to Philly and has prevented the Freidman from visitation rights then a beit-din ha no authority to overule. Even a lowly idiot such as myself can see more into this then what is being protrayed. It is for the benefit of the CHILDREN that the “get” is not beng issued. Its time the MOM grows up and get her life straight. Based on this information the MOM is not fit to have any custody. Such is justice. The Orthodox have it right. You wanna bet that the “get” is granted once the father receives his vsitation rights?
Ethan Halpern
BTW: You can share my email on this subject. I gave my wife her get immediately after the Civil Divorce was completed. We were adults. These two are children.


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

Getting a Divorce vs. Getting a Get

Civil and religious lines cross for one couple

More on Tablet:

Obama: Denying Israel’s Right to Exist as a Jewish Homeland is Anti-Semitic

By Yair Rosenberg — The president draws a line in the sand in his latest interview