If Murdoch Sells ‘Standard’
Will it lose its balanced Israel stance?
Rupert Murdoch is near a deal to sell The Weekly Standard to Philip Anschutz, a conservative evangelical Christian, according to the Los Angeles Times. With a net worth estimated at $8 billion, Anschutz has devoted a chunk of his fortune to building sports arenas and dabbling in political ones. He founded the Discovery Institute, which under the pseudo-scientific banner of “intelligent design,” tries to poke holes in the theory of evolution. In 1992, Anschutz funded Colorado’s Amendment 2, which would have quashed state and local legislation outlawing bigotry against gays. He’s also a film mogul whose Bristol Bay Productions brought us 2004’s Ray , which whitewashed Ray Charles’s family-unfriendly history of womanizing and drug abuse.
So he’s a bona fide conservative, sure, and would seem at first blush to make a good owner for the magazine. Except on this point: while the Standard is a partisan neoconservative journal, it has been remarkably nuanced on the Arab-Israeli conflict. (Disclosure: I’ve written for it, though on other topics.) People like to snarl about “neocons,” but there’s been precious little to find in the Standard pertaining to Palestinian statehood that couldn’t be described as politically and morally sophisticated. Peter Berkowitz is usually the byline on the subject, and his writing is worth revisiting. Most impressively, the Standard ran a lengthy cover story a few months ago by Gershom Gorenberg—the Israel correspondent for the liberal American Prospect; how’s that for ideological convergence?—lamenting that no great civil rights leader had emerged in Gaza or the West Bank in 40 years of occupation. Evangelicals are a famously hardline pro-Israel group, usually for messianic reasons. Under Anschutz, could the Standard forfeit credibility on the one foreign-policy issue it has never received enough credit for?
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.