‘Standard’ Rabbi Revealed
Explains opposition to same-sex marriage, announcements
Rabbi Shmuel Goldin, a north Jersey-based vice president of the Rabbinical Council of America, was the one who informed the New Jersey Jewish Standard that it might be best, from the perspective of its Orthodox readership (and advertisers?), for the paper to cease publishing same-sex engagement announcements. He quite scrupulously details the Orthodox community’s internal contradictions. “We believe in respect for all individuals regardless of their sexual orientation and stand adamantly against any physical, mental or social violence committed against them,” he says. “At the same time we have a deep commitment to the integrity of Torah law, which clearly proscribes same-sex relationships.”
His explanation for apparently leaning on the Standard (he denies there were any explicit or implicit threats, but it is difficult to think that he didn’t realize that the prospect of diminished circulation and/or advertising wouldn’t occur to the Standard brass whom he telephoned), however, doesn’t add up as well. “Sometimes people feel that they have the right to make their choices and then to obligate others to celebrate their choices,” he explains of his decision to ask the Standard not to run the announcements. “We believe that we cannot celebrate these choices.” Um, then just don’t?
What Do We Do When We Disagree? [New Jersey Jewish Standard]
Orthodox Unsure How To React to Anti-Gay Violence, Discrimination [JTA via JustASC]
Earlier: ‘Standard’ Publisher Clarifies Same-Sex Stance
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.