Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another

thescroll_header

How Many Shofars Does It Take …

… to make the walls come tumbling down?

Print Email
Jean Fouquet’s The Taking of Jericho.(Wikipedia)

Could the walls of Jericho have been destroyed by the force of seven shofars blowing (along with thousands of people shouting), as the Book of Joshua has it? This absurdly entertaining podcast takes that question as literally as possible, discussing Bronze Age walls; how many decibels toppling them would require (at least 177); what 10 talented shofar-blowers playing together sound like (this is the advantage of the podcast form!); how many shofar-blowers could create 177 decibels (407,380, at a minimum); at what decibel-level air essentially turns to plasma (160) … look, it can’t be done.

And then the expert explaining all of this, David Lubman, manages to come up with an insanely plausible explanation for how the story came about (which I refuse to spoil), thereby reminding us that engineers are the cleverest folks around. And the most realistic: “But of course,” Lubman adds, “if it was a miracle, all bets were off.”

The Walls of Jericho [Radiolab]

Print Email

COMMENTING CHARGES
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at letters@tabletmag.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

David Lubman says:

Thank you so much Marc Tracy for “getting it”.

This reinterpretation attempts a rationalist explanation of the Joshua – Jericho story.

It tampers with Joshua 6 mainly by reversing the time sequence of two events:

(1) The shouting and shofar blowing, and
(2) The falling of a portion of Jericho’s wall.

These two events, if they actually happened, may have taken place only about a minute apart. I suggest they happened in reverse order. First the wall fell. Then the soldiers shouted.

Since the rank & file Israelite soldiers lacked a “need to know”, they couldn’t have expected the wall to fall at that moment. What else would they do when, unexpectedly, the wall fell, if not shout? First in surprise, and then in victory!

What do thousands of stadium spectators do at the moment a batter unexpectedly hits the winning home run?

I can understand how, after centuries of retelling the two events were remembered in reverse order.

This is not unlike the Chanukah story that was sanctioned by religious authorities only after it was recast to show divine intervention on behalf of the Jews.

One might even imagine Joshua’s staff deciding it prudent to let the Israelites continue to believe the victory was divine intervention. Because it better served the purpose of their leadership. Soldiers fight harder if they believe God is on their side. Also, Joshua and his top brass may have wanted to preserve secrecy so they could use that neat trick again.

The bishop in George Bernard Shaw’s St Joan defines a miracle as “That which inspires faith”.

Get a life and leave our’s alone

2000

Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

How Many Shofars Does It Take …

… to make the walls come tumbling down?

More on Tablet:

Sign on the Dotted Line

By Beverly Siegel — To fight the chained-wife problem, more women are insisting on a special prenup