One Chicagoan Thinks Rahm Can Be Mayor
Nana begs to differ with Tablet Magazine article
Rachel Shtair’s provocative article today argues that, due to its legendary ethnic segregation, Midwestern values, latent anti-Semitism, and several other things, Chicago simply will not elect a Jewish mayor—not Rahm Emanuel or any other. In response, Jewcy editor Jason Diamond—an American, Chicago born—decided to consult an expert. In this case, his 85-year-old grandmother, a lifelong Chicagoan (well, until she moved to Boca). Highlights:
• “You know your Grandpa was very popular. They named the locker room at the Winston Towers pool after him, and Lenny Spector was always saying ‘Bernie could be Mayor of Chicago! Everybody loves him.’”
• “Oh, Rahm isn’t THAT Jewish. Your cousin Michael is too Jewish. You should call Michael more, you could be more Jewish like him. You know he has a nice business and his wife is so beautiful. Every time he comes to visit me, he is so handsome that even if the restaurant is full, the girls fall over themselves to give us a table.”
• “It’s Chicago. All your neighbors are like you. It’s because of this Daley’s father [the late Mayor Richard J. Daley]. He did such a good job of segregating the entire city. Jews used to live in different places, but then we all moved uptown. Do you remember seeing people that weren’t Jews in our neighborhood?”
• “Are you sure your girlfriend didn’t write this?”
Out of the Loop [Tablet Magazine]
Talking to My 80-Something Year Old Chicago Nana About Rahm Emanuel [Jewcy]
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.