Direct Peace Talk
The freeze extension is the only issue right now
Are there impending direct peace talks between Prime Minister Netanyahu and President Abbas, or an impending direct peace talk? The September 2 session in Washington, D.C., will last one day only, and will deal with one subject only: The West Bank construction freeze, currently scheduled to expire on September 26 (which, naturally, is right after Sukkot, the ultimate holiday of building).
While that freeze is but the tip of very, very large iceberg of issues concerning Israeli-Palestinian peace, in a sense it is the only one worth talking about: Abbas has said peace talks will end if the freeze is not extended, period. The way out of this, say some on both left and right, is that Abbas could agree to recognize a freeze extension that excludes recognized settlements around Jerusalem, which, most assume, will be located in Israel proper under any comprehensive final deal. (It’s worth remembering, also, that Abbas has already moved on this issue: Earlier this year, he nixed direct talks without a freeze in East Jerusalem.)
And yet! Even a limited freeze seems too much to ask from the hawks in Netanyahu’s Likud Party. (Opposition leader Tzipi Livni, by contrast, is tentatively backing negotiations.) And any talks whatsoever are “illegitimate,” if you consult Hamas: The results “do not obligate our people to anything,” the group’s head, Khaled Meshal, insisted.
Actually, as things look right now, the party that stands the most to lose if either side (or both sides) decides to take its toys and go home is the United States, which is hosting the talk(s) and has pegged the peace process to them. Which is why envoy George Mitchell and a senior administration official have been demanding that neither side rock the boat. If the talks fall apart, Obama looks weak and bad. If, however, Obama is able to solve the impasse, he comes out looking pretty great. Will fortune favor the bold?
‘Direct Talks’ Scheduled for a Total of One Day [Arutz Sheva]
End of Settlement Freeze Could Derail Mideast Talks [Washington Times]
U.S. Warns Israel, Palestinians: Refrain from Harming Peace Talks [AP/Haaretz]
Earlier: Direct Talks, Next Month
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.