Despite Rumor, Harvard Isn’t Divesting
How your non-news sausage gets made
Harvard—which has by far the country’s biggest university endowment—apparently sold all its Israeli stocks, according to SEC filings. Rumor had it that the move was politically motivated; and even some who didn’t think it was politically motivated nonetheless think it bespeaks a larger point about … something.
Fact is, it just, kinda, doesn’t mean anything. Felix Salmon astutely noted, “The chances of this move being at all politically motivated are remote. I’m sure,” he added,
that if you looked at all endowment 13-Fs on a quarterly basis, you’d find that every quarter a pretty large number of endowments will turn out to have sold out of some small market or other. It’s just that by sheer coincidence, this time it’s the two big hot-button names, Harvard and Israel, and hence there’s lots of headlines.
Next quarter, or the one after that, a few Israeli holdings are bound to reappear in Harvard’s 13-F. I wonder whether anybody will notice that.
And actually the real explanation is even more mundane: Turns out that because of Israeli growth, Harvard no longer classifies Israel as an emerging market, but rather as a developed one, which necessitated moving the stocks out of that one part of its portfolio. “We have holdings in developed markets, including Israel, through outside managers in commingled accounts and indexes,” a Harvard Management Company spokesperson said.
There is probably a larger lesson in this, about the dangers of seizing on apparent news rapidly instead of doing your homework, but as a blog dedicated to being updated several times a day, we are going to choose to willfully ignore that.
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.