Lebanon Doesn’t Need Our Steenkin’ Weapons
As border heats up, rebuke of U.S. funding block
Today, Tablet Magazine Mideast columnist Lee Smith explored the future of U.S. military aid to Lebanon, in light of last week’s border skirmish—provoked by the Lebanese Armed Forces—and now two prominent congresspersons’ blocking of a planned $100 million. Lebanon’s first response to this block was to call it “unwarranted,” but pretty soon—and particularly after Iran pledged to compensate for the funding shortfall (which the United States in turn blasted)—Lebanon changed its tune: The country’s defense minister said it would reject U.S. military aid if it came on the condition that it could not be used against Israel (the sniper rifle responsible for the death last week of an Israeli reserves officer was almost certainly bought with American money).
Think it’s bad? Things may get even crazier when the United Nations issues its indictments for the 2005 assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri. Syria was generally thought to be behind it, with Hezbollah’s aid; of course, they are now cozier with the Lebanese leadership, including the current prime minister, Saad Hariri—Rafik’s son. As they say, Developing … .
Lebanon: We’ll Reject U.S. Military Aid if Weapons Can’t Be Used Against Israel [Haaretz]
Lebanon Crisis Feared As Indictments Near in Assassination of Rafiq Hariri [WP]
Cinders of Lebanon [Tablet Magazine]
Earlier: What Happened in Lebanon
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.