Cantor Moves Against Lebanon Aid
Top Jewish GOPer cites last week’s incident
Prompted by last week’s Lebanon-provoked skirmish, which left dead two Lebanese soldiers, a Lebanese journalist, and an Israeli reserves officer, Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Virginia), the second-ranking Republican in the House of Representatives and the only Jewish Republican federal lawmaker, announced that he will seek to block $100 million in planned U.S. funding to the Lebanese Armed Forces. Noting the $720 million in military aid since 2006, Cantor said, “The days of ignoring the LAF’s provocations against Israel and protection of Hezbollah in Southern Lebanon are over. Lebanon cannot have it both ways.”
Last week, in Tablet Magazine, Maariv columnist Yoav Fromer made much the same argument: That the “calculated risk” of U.S. military aid to Lebanon—it is intended to shore up the central government, bring stability to the tenuous multiethnic nation, and tamp down Hezbollah’s influence—is being used against Israel. “About 60 percent of the Lebanese army and a third of its officer corps are Shiites,” Fromer wrote,
whose communal champion is Hezbollah. In case of another Hezbollah war with Israel—an ever-increasing possibility—it seems highly improbable that thousands of Shiite soldiers deployed throughout southern Lebanon and well equipped with brand-new U.S. weapons will sit still, as U.S. policymakers have assumed. Instead, what Tuesday’s events suggest is that they will pick up their U.S. weapons, and turn them against one of the closest U.S. allies.
Congressman Cantor Backs Halt to U.S. Military Aid to Lebanon [Arutz Sheva]
Earlier: What Happened in the North
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.