Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another

thescroll_header

Study: Attack Won’t Work, Will Cause Long War

The consequences of bombing Iran

Print Email
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad last month.(Atta Kenare/AFP/Getty Images)

A new study argues that Israeli military action against Iran’s nuclear weapons facilities would fail to substantially halt the program and would lead to a long war. Grain-of-salt alert: The study was produced by a think tank that that “promotes non-violent solutions to conflict” and was written by a professor of “peace studies.”

A few months ago in Tablet Magazine, Yoav Fromer reported on a different study, by an Israeli physicist, that reached a similar conclusion: A military attack would prompt a war that would last years, not months or days.

Most other studies, Fromer adds, envision a shorter follow-up war. And almost all, including (it appears) this new study, agree on what the Islamic Republic’s immediate response would be:

Iran would initially retaliate by lobbing ballistic missiles at Israel, while Tehran’s proxies Hezbollah and Hamas would bear most of the burden by launching corresponding rocket attacks from Gaza and Lebanon. Most predictions also include some Iranian attempt to wage economic warfare by sealing off the Strait of Hormuz to stop the flow of oil.

Which is why, as Eli Lake does a great job reporting in the The New Republic, perhaps the real ideal is to disrupt Iran’s nuclear program via covert sabotage—and don’t think Israel and the United States are not trying.

Israel Attack Wouldn’t Stop Iran Nuclear Program, Says U.K. Study [Reuters/Haaretz]
Related: Not So Fast [Tablet Magazine]
Operation Sabotage [TNR]

Print Email
MarcH says:

“Israeli military action against Iran’s nuclear weapons facilities would fail to substantially halt the program .. perhaps the real ideal is to disrupt Iran’s nuclear program via covert sabotage”

How about the options of U.S. attack, strong U.S. and/or Israeli support for dissidents to effect regieme change or a combination of the two options?

rykart says:

How about the vermin of Israel agreeing to a nuclear-free zone in the Middle East, subject to IAEA monitoring, as the Iranians have?

Oh no. Never. Israel act with decency and sanity instead of menacing the region with its nuclear arsenal and blabbering its bellicose horse shit about being God’s Chosen people?

Dream on.

What a joke. It would not be a long war at all. I’m 100% certain of this. Iran would get their asses whipped quickly. Blocking the straight would be futile. It would be like a video game annihilating the Iranian navy trying to block the straight. Not even the Iranian military guys would want to fight. They want the regime gone as well.

2000

Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

Study: Attack Won’t Work, Will Cause Long War

The consequences of bombing Iran

More on Tablet:

The True Story of Thanksgiving

By Zachary Schrieber — A new historical account was recently discovered. It is recorded here.