Bork Borks Over Barak
Kagan had praised controversial Israeli chief justice
Who better to bork a U.S. Supreme Court nominee than Robert Bork? The conservative judge called for the U.S. Senate to reject Elena Kagan’s nomination to the bench on the grounds of her prior praise for Aharon Barak, the onetime chief justice of the Israeli Supreme Court whom conservatives disparage for his judicial activism. In a conference call organized by the anti-abortion group Americans United for Life, Bork yesterday called Barak “the worst judge on the planet” and said that Kagan’s past stance on him—introducing him at an event, she called him “my judicial hero”—is “disqualifying in and of itself.”
The Orthodox Union’s political maven Nathan Diament offered a different take in an email blast: “It is certainly true,” he wrote,
that Chief Justice Barak was a proud and aggressive judicial activist who led the Israeli Supreme Court into making decisions many questioned—and we were among the many doing so.
But it is also true that Kagan praised Barak in the course of introducing him to an audience at the Harvard Law School—when she was Dean—isn’t that typical social convention? Event [sic] current U.S. Supreme Court Justice Scalia did the same for Justice Barak.
On a related note, want to read every email Kagan received while she was working in the White House in 1999? Of course you do! Check out Elena’s Inbox.
Bork Hits Kagan Over Israeli Judge [Politico]
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.