Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another


Toward a New Kosher?

When eating pork is a Jewish act

Print Email

At beliefnet, Rabbi Brad Hirschfeld noticed that New York Times restaurant critic Sam Sifton’s latest review, of the innovative Williamsburg barbecue joint Fatty ‘Cue, repeatedly describes emphatically un-kosher dishes in religious dietary terms. A mix of different types of fat, including pork fat, is “schmaltz for the deeply Reform”; a dish of clams with bacon is “in keeping with the restaurant’s interpretation of kashrut.”

Here’s what Hirschfeld says:

Far from mocking Jewish tradition, Sifton taps into the Jewish language which is clearly a part of his life to describe both the ways in which Kashrut uses eating to heighten a sense of one’s identity and how it expresses a commitment to something larger than the food on the plate. By proclaiming the treyf-ness (treyfiocoity?) of the food he was eating, and using traditional language to do so, Sifton placed the meal squarely within those traditions. In effect, treyf became a new kind of kashrut.

Hirschfeld goes on to suppose that we could be witnessing the birth of “a new kind of kosher”—literally. (As in, the religious definition could change.)

What I take away from his keen observation is a little different. The relevant thing about Sifton’s take on Fatty ‘Cue is that he is breaking the laws of kashrut, but is still understanding his eating experience, even jokingly, in terms of those laws. For him, eating pork is more than just eating pork; and eating pork fat mixed with chicken fat—which is to say, with schmaltz, the indelible Jewish edible—is thrillingly subversive. Put another way: It used to be that Jews couldn’t eat clams and bacon. Now, Jews can eat them, and have more important experiences doing so than Gentiles can. (Moreover, guess how I learned about Hirschfeld’s post?)

The new restaurant Traif, located all of a few blocks from Fatty ‘Cue, is similar. It is not kosher, but deliberately: It goes out of its way to serve shellfish and (especially) pork. It understands itself in terms of its relation to kashrut. It is less likely to lead to a new definition of kosher than to reinforce the current definition, since it depends on the old laws for its very identity.

This is not the freedom of no rules, but the freedom of breaking the rules, which is the much more meaningful sort of freedom. Sifton’s reviews and Traif do not anticipate a new kind of kosher. But they just might anticipate a new kind of Jewishness.

Is Treyf The New Kosher? [beliefnet]
Earlier: An Evening at Traif

Print Email
Shmuel says:

This is child like. Jews who choose not to keep kosher have been eating a lot of traif food since the 1800’s or so.

this is not news at all. and the effort to portray this restaurant and the eating of non-kosher food as somehow a Jewish act etc – is really pathetic. How far can you stretch the desire to define anything you do as Jewish?

Hanoi Paris Hilton says:

Lame. Hopelessly lame. Spare us future such interpretations of the New Jew.

Julian says:

What is it with you people? No body gets this?? It’s tongue in cheek!! (both Kosher!!!)

Hanoi Paris Hilton says:

Look, Julian, when I scroll through a nominally Jewish publication I don’t need, want, nor expect to find pigmeat illustrations. It’s bad enough when Roger L. Simon goes berserk over some scrumptious Asian pork dish in his PJM blog, but at least there we don’t have to look at any freaking supersaturated bacon pictures.


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

Toward a New Kosher?

When eating pork is a Jewish act

More on Tablet:

The Lost Tribes of Israel

By Matt Rees — The Jewish state seeks to bring the Bedouin in from the desert