Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another


Sundown: Europe’s J Street

Plus, the ‘new Afrikaners,’ a murder trial, and a foot robbery

Print Email

• A group called JCall will launch next week as the self-proclaimed European answer to J Street. Organizers include a member of the EU Parliament and the ubiquitous Bernard-Henri Levy. (BHL, The Scroll would like to an extend a temporary freeze on our policy of mocking you.) Interesting to note: In an interview with the Jerusalem Post, a JCall official used the word “colonization” to describe Israeli policy—which we’re fairly sure is a word verboten in the J Street lexicon. [J’lem Post]

Israel Lobby co-author John Mearsheimer postulated in a speech today that Israel and the Palestinians are off the two-state solution track and that instead full-fledged apartheid will be followed by a bi-national state. Extending the apartheid analogy further than it usually goes, he classified a number of prominent American Zionists, from Abe Foxman of the ADL to Marty Peretz of the New Republic, as “new Afrikaners.” [Jerusalem Fund]

• The New Yorker proffers a real-life courtroom drama by Janet Malcolm about the 2009 trial of a woman who hired her cousin to murder her estranged husband at a playground—all set within the Bukharan Jewish community in Queens. Subscription unfortunately required. [New Yorker]

• Police apprehended a young man outside a Dallas Jewish cemetery who had removed and stolen a foot from a body in one of the graves. He told the cops that he “took it from a Jew girl just because I wanted a foot.” [Vos Iz Neias]

Print Email

Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

Mort Zuckerman, legendary philanthropist, is an Afrikaner, according to Mearsheimer. $100 million to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Afrikaner. $10 million to the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, employer of Mearsheimer’s fellow antisemite and co-writer, Stephen Walt. Afrikaner. Contribution to buy Israeli Settler greenhouses for Palestinians about to take over Gaza. Afrikaner.

This is no different from labeling Arab-Americans terrorists. Will Andrew Sullivan, whom Mearsheimer cites, be denouncing this label?

jd says:

“Extending the apartheid analogy further than it usually goes, he classified a number of prominent American Zionists, from Abe Foxman of the ADL to Marty Peretz of the New Republic, as “new Afrikaners.” [Jerusalem Fund]”

So being a member of the ethnic group Afrikaners is an insult. Afrikaan is the name of their language.

We kwnow why he didn’t he call them the “new Germans,” don’t we?

DG says:

I think one can legitimately question whether Walt is simply a strict foreign policy realist or not, but Mearsheimer has repeatedly shown that he’s an anti-semite. His public appearances and utterances over the past 18 months have been pretty shocking. He discredits himself almost every time he opens his mouth.

I’m a bit shocked that Walt hasn’t distanced himself.

fw says:

I think you may be on to something DG, although Walt does say some awful things. I just get the sense he’s clueless. Clueless, of course, can be dangerous, even if unwittingly so.

Mearsheimer is citing writers who are not merely critical of Israel, but of Jews. In fact, who exude spite for Jews. And he celebrates them. I think it’s telling. And I think it also illustrates the danger of the monsters of cowardice, like Finkelstein, who sublimate their anger by adopting the perspective of the antisemite, their historic tormenter. It’s a form of relief by switching identity, and the reason, I think, that it’s found among those Jews with real ties to the Holocaust, like Judt, and Finkelstein. The horror is unbearable, so they identify with the aggressor, instead of the victim. Unfortunately, it provides truly malicious types like Mearsheimer with a kind of rationalization.

Marc R says:

Not only has Walt not distanced himself, he specifically endorses this grouping of Jews into Good Jews and Bad Jews:

fw says:

Not a surprise; coming to the defense of his partner. Their reactions and motivations are infantile; the people Mearsheimer criticizes are people are people who took issue with their book. They don’t seem to understand that there is a big difference between criticizing–even harshly criticizing–the authors of a book and its thesis, and slandering an entire ethnic group. They’ve gone down a very dark road.

Dana Letvin says:

The real apartheid nations are the Islamic ones who allow no Jews. But these two and many others are too anti-Semitic to acknowledge it.

Susan Speil says:

This is just one more way for the media to put Israel alone, while ignoring the real problem of Islam and the Palestinians hatred. The new PLO headquarters in W.Bank is on the corner of two streets, both named after terrorists who killed many Israelis, the schools also are named after the terrorists, they are praised everywhere in W.Bank and Gaza.

Israel has tried a freeze on building, but it didn’t bring peace; neither did a total pullout from Gaza, but in fact the opposite, terrorism 24/7 on southern Israel.

Dana Letvin (comment here) is correct in saying the real apartheid nations are those that don’t allow Jews, the Islamic countries, not Israel.

If these people do not live in Israel and see their friends and families killed, why do they think at all? They are not logical or fair, just more blind hatred here.

Even on a legal basis, winning a defensive war is never a basis on giving back land to the attackers. They will only attack again and again, as history has proven.


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

Sundown: Europe’s J Street

Plus, the ‘new Afrikaners,’ a murder trial, and a foot robbery

More on Tablet:

How to Protect the Conversion Process

By Tzipi Sutin — My friend was recorded in a mikveh by a rabbi. Let’s ensure the end of this abuse of power.