Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another

thescroll_header

America, The Better Bomber

Abrams, TNR prefer a U.S. strike on Iran to an Israeli one

Print Email

It’s not surprising to find hawkish Bush administration Mideast expert Elliott Abrams, whom Tablet Magazine’s Lee Smith profiled last month, advocating an air strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities. But, at a seminar in Baltimore a few days ago, he argued in favor of a crucial nuance: That it would actually be better if America, and not Israel, was the one doing the bombing. “If the world does not act,” he observed, “I believe Israel will act, and I hope the U.S. will.” Steve Rosen, a onetime top AIPAC adviser, agreed: “The U.S. would be more efficient than Israel at suppressing Iran.”

The emerging U.S.-is-the-better-bomber meme is given wider airing in an excellent New Republic article. Unlike Abrams and Rosen, author Michael Crowley is agnostic-to-skeptical on the wisdom of bombing Iran (“Let’s pause here to reiterate the obvious fact that a U.S. attack on Iran might well be an epic disaster”). However, he is emphatic that “if someone is going to bomb Iran, it shouldn’t be Israel. It should be America.” The main reason? Detailed analyses and extensive war games suggest that an American air attack would have a far higher likelihood of actually doing real damage to Iran’s nuclear weapons program. Plus, Crowley adds, even an Israeli strike would probably draw America deeply into the subsequent conflict with Iran—in other words, there would be little additional fallout if it was actually us doing the bombing (which is kind of perverse, but whaddya gonna do?). So, the thinking goes, if it’s something our government decides it supports, it might as well sign its name to it. For now, of course, that remains a hefty if.

Abrams: U.S. Must Address Iran’s Threat to Israel [JTA]
The Bomb Squad [TNR]
Related: The Shadow Viceroy [Tablet Magazine]

Print Email
Honest Broker says:

Bombing Iran will be completely ineffective in stopping its distributed nuclear facilities and will make whoever does a villain in the eyes of most of the world for generations.It’s time to realize that simplistic solutions to complex problems are not the answer. Pakistan has nuclear weapons and is unstable enough that Iran’s fall could cause it to replace Iran as the rogue power. Further as a terrorist weapon conventional explosives surrounded by radioactive waste could be very effective and even Yemen or Somalia is capable of producing them.

Forget about over-hyped enlargement gimmicks like pill

The headache is mine and the cows are ours. – Portuguese Proverb

A cup of proper coffee in a copper coffee cup.

David Baden -Australia says:

If Iran’s nuclear was wiped out,regardless by who,and there was no ground troop intervention,then apart from a few weeks of ranting and raving about revenge,they could do nothing about it and would probably be the end of their lunatic president.Don’t forget who is arming and supporting these brainwashed fanatics,i.e the Taliban,Hamas,Hezbollah plus many other smaller groups scattered throughout the world,costing the free world billions of dollars,not to mention the tragic waste of young allied soldiers in Afghanistan etc.

2000

Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Be a Mensch. Support Tablet.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

America, The Better Bomber

Abrams, TNR prefer a U.S. strike on Iran to an Israeli one

More on Tablet:

Rediscovering the First Woman Rabbi

By Laura Geller — Ordained in 1935, Regina Jonas died at Auschwitz. Now, she’s being honored.