Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another


U.S., Israel: Mere Distant Cousins?

Top thinker says Mideast peace would barely affect us

Print Email

Yesterday, Richard Haass, the prototypical foreign policy éminence grise–he is literally the president of the Council on Foreign Relations—had an interesting Wall Street Journal op-ed his voice to the gathering chorus that favors putting the peace process on hold, not because it is fatally flawed or unfair to one side or the other, but because the time is just not quite right. Specifically, he says, “The Palestinian leadership remains weak and divided; the Israeli government is too ideological and fractured; U.S.-Israeli relations are too strained for Israel to place much faith in American promises.”

But that’s not what most caught my eye. What I found interesting is that Haass spends most of his essay repudiating the controversial notion, prominently expounded by Gen. David Petraeus and even President Obama, that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict hinders the completion of vital U.S. military and national security goals in the region. Dubbed “linkage” by its critics, the idea is that the dispute cultivates enmity toward the U.S. throughout the region, thereby making it more difficult for U.S. troops to pacify Afghanistan and Iraq and for U.S. diplomats to stymie Iran’s nuclear weapons program.

According to Haass, this is wrong: an equitable Palestinian settlement would not calm Iraq, subdue the Taliban, cause Iran to cede its nuclear ambitions, win over Arab governments, or halt terrorism.

What do I find interesting? When the question is simply Israel-Palestine, those most inclined to support Israel are the first to point to Israel’s tremendous importance to the United States as a strategic and intelligence-gathering partner, while those advocates of taking the special out of the “special relationship” tend to downplay Israel’s direct importance to U.S. interests. When the subject becomes America’s troops in the field, though, the most pro-Israel folks find themselves saying Israel is one thing and America is another, and the left-wing folks find an intimate connection between the two countries.

The Palestinian Peace Distraction [WSJ]
Earlier: What Petraeus Actually Said

Print Email
Shalom Freedman says:

As so many have pointed out the wars between Shiites and Sunnites pervade the Middle East, and are at the heart of what is going on here. What does Israel have to do with this, except for now being the target of the Iranians, Hizbollah the Shiite world in a more fanatical way than it is the target still of the Sunni world? In fact many have pointed out that there is a tacit alliance between Israel and the Sunnis in regard to stopping Iran from acquiring a nuclear capability. If the Obama Administration would at last do something about the Iranian problem this might truly improve the situation in the Middle East.


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

U.S., Israel: Mere Distant Cousins?

Top thinker says Mideast peace would barely affect us

More on Tablet:

Why Is the Islamist Death Cult So Appealing?

By Paul Berman — Explaining Sayyid Qutb, Bin Laden, Djamel Beghal, Chérif Kouachi, Amedy Coulibaly, Hayat Boumeddienne, and those yet to come