Obama Yanks Religion From Security Doc
Tablet profile today explains more
The current U.S. National Security Strategy, produced under the Bush Administration, states: “The struggle against militant Islamic radicalism is the great ideological conflict of the early years of the 21st century.” But the Obama Administration will remove all references to “Islamic extremism” and other religious terms from its version of the security document. According to reports, the change is championed by Pradeep Ramamurthy, who serves on President Obama’s National Security Council.
If Ramamurthy’s name sounds familiar, it’s because you’ve already read Tablet Magazine Mideast columnist Lee Smith’s piece today. It focuses on Dalia Mogahed, the founder of the Gallup Center for Muslim Studies. Smith specifically notes that Mogahed’s influence at the White House has come largely via … Pradeep Ramamurthy.
Mogahed has encouraged the White House to ‘demonstrate an appreciation for Islam’s contributions to the world, rather than simply reassuring Muslims that we believe Islam is peaceful.’ The point that America needs to make, she says, is that we believe Islam ‘is not just benign but beneficial.’ Speaking to the Muslim world as a great undifferentiated throng slights the specific historical and practical circumstances of individual countries but suits Obama’s self-image as a transformative leader, one who calls on different parts of the globe according to how they structure their fears and hopes and premonitions of the eternal.
Read Smith’s timely piece here.
UPDATE: Mogahed responds to Smith’s profile on Tablet Magazine contributing editor Jeffrey Goldberg’s blog.
Obama Bans Terms ‘Islam’ and ‘Jihad’ From Security Document [AP/Haaretz]
Respectfully Yours [Tablet Magazine]
The Most Influential Muslim at the White House? [Jeffrey Goldberg]
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.