Rep. Weiner Agrees: Sen. Lieberman Is ‘A Dick’
N.Y. congressman gives Jon Stewart ‘naches’
Okay, so admittedly there was a slight smile on the face of Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-New York) when Jon Stewart asked him last night, “Is Lieberman a dick?” and he answered, “Yes, Jon.” But he didn’t qualify it! And certainly Weiner might feel sourly toward Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-Connecticut), given the latter’s brazen health-care flip-flopping.
Weiner was on the The Daily Show to talk about his far more progressive plans for reform: his signature issue is the Medicare buy-in, which would allow certain additional folks—recent college grads, the newly unemployed, the pre-retirement middle-aged—to purchase Medicare, the government-run senior citizens’ insurance program, for themselves. While Weiner had kind words for President Barack Obama, he also made a pointed, sophisticated criticism: “The President has been too much LBJ here,” he said, referring to the former president and Senate majority leader’s legislative savvy. “We’ve been focusing on getting 60 votes in the Senate, and we’ve forgot that 100 million Americans are watching this debate wondering what it means for them.”
Stewart and Weiner also chatted about how they have been friends since the 1980s—apparently they used to go to the beach together. “I don’t know what you’ve done with Anthony Weiner, the one that I knew,” Stewart told him at conversation’s close, “but this new cat, this guy right here, in front of me? It gives me naches. That’s all I’m saying, it gives me naches.”
|The Daily Show With Jon Stewart||Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c|
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.