How To Explain Joe Lieberman: He’s Just Kinda Dumb!
Not all Jews can do math well, notes (Jewish) writer
Writer Jonathan Chait of The New Republic has a Semitically inflected theory of what explains Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Connecticut) and his seeming compulsion to throw a wrench into the Democratic policy agenda whenever he can—most recently, in the case of health-care reform. (Last night, Lieberman told Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid that he would not, as expected, support the current bill.) Many folks on the left, Chait notes, are positively dumbfounded by Lieberman’s refusal to support what Democrats consider to be sensible reform, especially given that he is typically thought of as moderate-to-liberal when it comes to domestic matters. So, grasping at straws, liberals accuse Lieberman of letting his personal grudge toward Democrats (many of whom supported Democratic nominee Ned Lamont rather than Lieberman during the 2006 Senate race) to influence his actual vote. But Chait offers this elegant and concise alternative explanation for Lieberman’s moves: “Lieberman isn’t actually all that smart.” And why is this fact difficult for liberals to acknowledge? “I suspect that Lieberman is the beneficiary, or possibly the victim, of a cultural stereotype that Jews are smart and good with numbers,” Chait hypothesizes. “Trust me, it’s not true.” (Probably worth noting that Chait himself is Jewish.) “If Senator Smith from Idaho was angering Democrats by spewing uninformed platitudes, most liberals would deride him as an idiot. With Lieberman, we all suspect it’s part of a plan.” Why Are Jews Liberals? Maybe only the smart ones are.
Understanding Joe Lieberman [The Plank]
Says monkey-breeding facility is Israeli (actually, it’s Mauritian)
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.