P.A.’s Unilateral Plan Not Finding Backers
U.S., Europeans, Hamas all voice objections
The Palestinian Authority’s new strategy—unilaterally declaring independence from Israel, then asking the U.N. Security Council to recognize a Palestinian state—doesn’t seem to be going very well. Yesterday, the United States weighed in for the first time since Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat floated it over the weekend, with U.S. senators on a visit to Israel yesterday afternoon saying their country would veto an unilateral declaration in the Security Council, according to Haaretz. Later yesterday evening, the U.S. State Department formally rejected the idea: “It is our strong belief and conviction that the best means to achieve the common goal of a contiguous and viable Palestine is through negotiations between the parties,” it said in a statement. Meantime, the current European Union president, Carl Bildt of Sweden, sent his own message of non-support. “I would hope that we would be in a position to recognize a Palestinian state, but there has to be one first, so I think that is somewhat premature,” he said this morning, according to Al Jazeera.
The Arab League, which includes most Arab states in the Middle East, is still backing the PA’s plan, the BBC says. The P.A.’s rival, Hamas, however, made the valid point yesterday that the new strategy is made somewhat lamer for not being exactly new. As Haaretz put it, “a unilateral declaration of statehood had already been made by the late Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat in 1988.”
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.