J Street Has Its Logic Backward
‘Peace’ should come before ‘Israel,’ argues commentator
There’s something wrong with J Street’s branding—or there will be in a week, after the left-leaning Zionist lobby’s first national conference raises its profile in Washington, Bernard Avishai, a liberal commentator on Israeli affairs, argues on Talking Points Memo. Right now, the group’s motto, and apparent underlying ideology, is “pro-Israel, pro-peace.” There’s an implied “therefore” between those terms, says Avishai (a member, by the way, of J Street’s advisory panel) that only makes sense for a limited constituency—i.e., some Jews—that takes support for Israel as a given and reasons politically from there. That’s not going to fly if J Street succeeds in becoming a real political force: “One cannot just assume that Congress will care what Jews want. One has to start with America’s foreign policy strategy and then apply its logic to the Middle East,” he writes. And that’s where AIPAC, the conservative Zionist lobby that J Street developed as an alternative to, is a useful model, he says: the group “actually became influential in Washington because it defined itself at a critical time not as ‘pro-Israel, pro-(well,) toughness’ but as ‘pro-freedom, (therefore) pro-Israel…. You can say that AIPAC was misguided, that it’s even become a pernicious force, but you can’t deny that it got its strategic premises ordered properly.” J Street would be a worthier opponent of AIPAC if it got its political logic straight, he argues: “pro-peace, pro-Israel.”
J Street and World Order [TPM]
Say captured soldier doesn’t follow commandments, shouldn’t be rescued
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.