Obama at U.N.: Negotiations Without Pre-Conditions
But what does he mean by a contiguous Palestinian state?
This morning, Barack Obama addressed the world’s heads of state at the opening of the United Nations General Assembly, and declared that achieving peace between Israel and the Palestinians should be among the world’s top priorities—along with halting nuclear proliferation, controlling climate change, and jump-starting the global economy. “The time has come to re-launch negotiations—without preconditions,” Obama said, largely reiterating the statements he made during yesterday’s session with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas at the Waldorf-Astoria.
“No pre-conditions” is, of course, code for Obama’s dropping his earlier insistence that Netanyahu agree to a freeze on settlement construction before negotiations begin—though in his speech, Obama insisted that “we continue to emphasize that America does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements.” As the New York Times noted this morning, it’s a pragmatic shift aimed at getting talks started sooner rather than later on the full slate of so-called permanent-status issues: borders, the rights of Palestinian refugees, and control over Jerusalem.
But alongside the usual language on establishing two viable states living side by side in peace and security, we were surprised to hear Obama refer to something that didn’t, as far as we can tell, come up yesterday at all: the desire to guarantee the Palestinians “contiguous territory.” It’s not the first time the issue has come up—Bush mentioned it, and so did the Mideast Quartet of negotiating partners in their June report—and it’s not immediately clear what Obama meant. Geographically, of course, a territory that joins the West Bank and Gaza would mean splitting Israel, but “contiguous” has also been used to refer to a guaranteed transit corridor between the two Palestinian areas, and, less substantially, to a West Bank free from a “Swiss cheese” patchwork of Israeli settlements.
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.