Israel vs. Sweden on Organ Harvesting
A newspaper story becomes a diplomatic spat
Last week, the Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet published a story alleging that Israeli troops harvest organs from dead Palestinians, under the headline “Our Sons Are Plundered for Their Organs.” The writer, Daniel Bostrom, based the piece not so much on, you know, evidence as on unsubstantiated claims from Palestinian families in the West Bank and Gaza, who told him they’d seen a man’s body returned to his family with stitches along the length of his torso.
Israel immediately accused the newspaper of blood libel and demanded Sweden’s Foreign Minister, Carl Bildt, condemn it; Bildt responded in a blog post that he would not, because he stood by the freedom of the press. Now the affair has metastasized into a fullblown diplomatic mess. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is apparently saying, behind closed doors, that he won’t rest until Aftonbladet apologizes. (“We asked the Swedish government to express moral outrage and they don’t have the moral fortitude to do it,” Netanyahu’s chief spokesman, Daniel Seaman, told Tablet this morning, drawing a link to Sweden’s neutral stance during World War II.) To show everyone Israel means business, Israelis are being urged to boycott Swedish furniture superstore Ikea.
Meanwhile, Swedish Jews are blaming Israel for mishandling the response. Lena Posner, president of the Official Council of Jewish Communities in Sweden, told Haaretz that now the debate is all about whether Israel has the right to control the Swedish press, not about the irresponsibility of the reporter in the first place. “By making the preposterous demand for a government condemnation, the debate has changed from anti-Semitism to freedom of speech in Sweden,” Posner said.
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.