Bin Laden’s Son-in-Law Wants to Keep His Jewish Lawyer
The Jewish judge in the case is trying to dissuade him
What do you get when you combine a high-profile federal terrorism case with a Manhattan locale? A lot of unintentional hilarity.
So goes the case of Sulaiman Abu Ghaith, Osama bin Laden’s son-in-law, who faces trial for reportedly conspiring to kill Americans. Following his arraignment, Abu Ghaith was assigned an experienced public defender, but decided he doesn’t want one. Who does he want instead? Stanley L. Cohen.
What’s all the hubbub about? Well….
But the handoff in Mr. Abu Ghaith’s case has been complicated by the fact that Mr. Cohen is under federal indictment in Syracuse and under federal investigation in Manhattan, a judge said in court last week. Mr. Cohen said the investigations were related.
The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan, took Mr. Abu Ghaith through a series of questions to make sure he understood the potential risks and ethical conflicts that might result from hiring Mr. Cohen, because of the lawyer’s own legal difficulties. Mr. Cohen was charged with obstructing the Internal Revenue Service and failing to file certain reports regarding cash transactions. He has pleaded not guilty.
“You understand that if he is found guilty of those charges, he may be sent to jail?” Judge Kaplan said.
“Yes,” Mr. Abu Ghaith replied.
Cohen is what one might call an eccentric. Not only does he believe that the American government has declared war on him, but Cohen also has a record of representing clients in terrorism across the country, including a prominent Hamas leader in 1990s. In addition to the risk that Cohen might go to jail in the middle of representing Abu Ghaith, Cohen might also not be given the security clearance required to see classified materials in the case.
Two young filmmakers are bringing the story of Streit’s Matzo Factory to life
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.