Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another


Hogs With Uncloven Hooves Are Twice As Trayf

Or perhaps the most Jewish ‘Times’ correction ever

Print Email

Yesterday, the Times City Room blog wrote excitedly about the new trio of mulefoots, which are hogs with…feet like mules…, that are now hanging out at Queens Zoo. They’re being described as beautiful and rare by some and as off-putting as dogs with shoes by me.

City Room ended its post about the piglets with this sentence: “It was not immediately clear whether the meat of hogs with uncloven hooves was considered kosher.” Of course, this prompted one of the most Jewish corrections in the history of the Times, spotted moments ago by our intrepid Yair Rosenberg.

Update, 4:26 p.m. | City Room, based on its extremely poor religious training, made the mistake above of wondering aloud whether meat from a pig with an uncloven hoof would still be considered nonkosher.

Rabbi Moshe Elefant, chief operating officer of the kashrut division of the Orthodox Union, the largest kosher certification organization in the world, quickly set us straight.

“Actually this pig is even worse than all other pigs,” he said. “Not only does it not chew its cud, it doesn’t have a split hoof.”

Split hoof = kosher. Unsplit = nonkosher. The thing that makes pigs nonkosher is that they don’t chew their cud. We will remember this. Thanks, Rabbi.

We will remember this too. Thanks, Rabbi.

New Zoo Rarity: Hogs With Uncloven Hooves [NYT]

Print Email

Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

Poupic says:

To be kasher an animal needs both split hoof AND to chew their cud.

    Raymond_in_DC says:

    To be precise, those criteria apply only to land animals. Different criteria apply to sea creatures (fins and scales), birds (identified specifically) and locusts.

Is an Elefant Kosher?

Is an Elefant Kosher?

Is an Elefant Kosher?

Is an Elefant kosher?

Is an Elefant kosher?

Is an Elefant kosher?


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

Hogs With Uncloven Hooves Are Twice As Trayf

Or perhaps the most Jewish ‘Times’ correction ever

More on Tablet:

11 Non-Jewish Celebrities—and 2 Jewish Ones—Show Off Their Hebrew Tattoos

By Marjorie Ingall — You don’t have to be Jewish to sport Hebrew ink. But some of these stars should have thought twice before going under the needle.