Is ‘The Diary of Anne Frank’ Too Racy?
One parent in Michigan believes the unedited version is, files complaint
Here’s something maybe we shouldn’t be talking about when we talk about Anne Frank: whether the definitive, unedited version of her famous diary is ‘pornographic’ or not.
According to one Michigan parent, the less commonly used edition of the diary contains detailed descriptions in which Frank (for intentional lack of a better description) makes biological observations presumably not uncommon to those of most female teenagers. The parent, Gail Horalek, has filed a complaint after her daughter complained:
After the class had been reading it for a week, Horalek said her daughter told her she didn’t want to read the book anymore because it made her uncomfortable. Horalek thought it might be because of the book’s depressing nature in regards to the Holocaust. But her daughter said that wasn’t why and gave Horalek the page numbers for the graphic passages.
This particular material is inappropriate for seventh grade students to read, especially without their parents’ knowledge, Horalek said.
“It doesn’t mean my child is sheltered, it doesn’t mean I live in a bubble, and it doesn’t mean I’m trying to ban books,” she said.
Another article includes a passage from the unedited version, which I feel odd publishing here on the site, which may or may not sway you.
So long as I am childless, I am happily going to sit this one out. But I’d be curious to hear what others have to say about this controversy.
Students Need Parents’ Permission Before Reading Unedited ‘Diary of Anne Frank,’ Northville Mother Says [Northville Patch]
Northville mother files complaint about passages in the unedited version of ‘The Diary of Anne Frank’ [Fox]
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at firstname.lastname@example.org. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.