‘Heeb’ Explains Hitler Image
Yes, that’s Roseanne dressed as the Führer
Certainly Heeb magazine intended to provoke when it included a photograph in their latest number, “The German Issue”, of comedienne Roseanne Barr dressed as Hitler and taking burned, man-shaped cookies out of the oven. (To see the image, click here.) Admirably, the New York City-based “satirical Jewish culture magazine” readily admitted to pushing the envelope for pushing the envelope’s sake: doing so is part of its quest, its publisher explains in a blogpost, to be a magazine that “interrogates stereotypes and ideas (hopefully in creative ways) that many hold sacred in order to represent the complex and nuanced perspectives that many Jews have about their identities.” As another example, he cited a past image of Jewish actor Jonah Hill dressed as Moses and holding the two tablets, which in Heeb are replaced with two kegs of beer.
The Barr photo, the publisher said, was meant to question “whether something new was happening in the culture—whether the taboo against joking about the Holocaust and the Nazis exerted as much power as it used to.” While that’s a legitimate mission, it was probably clear that the Holocaust taboo had weakened over 40 years ago, when Mel Brooks’s The Producers was released. Which brings us to our only question about the Barr image: what, actually, is the joke? Unlike The Producers, in which the humor is as obvious as the offensiveness, the Barr image is arresting and provocative but little more. We agree that people would be wrong to accuse Heeb of ill intentions. But Heeb should be less worried about such overt critics and more concerned about those who take a look, register the image, and then move on to something else that doesn’t commit the lesser sin of protesting too much.
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.