Counting on the Jewish Vote in Los Angeles
In the race to become the next mayor, candidates play up their Jewish cred
This recent presidential election should have—in theory—made a few things clear to politicians about what to avoid doing in public appearances. They should all know by now that pretending to be something might land them more YouTube hits than votes. Paul Ryan scrubbed a clean pot to show he was just as working class as the rest of America. Romney allegedly wore bronzer to seem Hispanic when he appeared on Univision. And they all pretended to be Jewish when they addressed the Republican Jewish Coalition—Michelle tried to say Shalom, Mitt misquoted Seinfeld. It was almost like an episode of Benny Hill.
It turns out that the upcoming Los Angeles mayoral election will require candidates to play the proverbial Jew card once again. A recent debate was held in a synagogue, and the upcoming primary debate will be at Sinai Temple, suggesting that the Jewish vote may have a significant role in deciding which candidate will succeed Antonio Villaraigosa.
Because several of the candidates are actually Jewish, the debate became a contest of who is most Jewish, with one candidate, Eric Garcetti, using his family’s history in pogroms as a credential, and another, Jan Perry, citing the fact that she is black, bilingual, and a convert to Judaism. Candidate Wendy Greuel is not Jewish, but still felt like she needed to talk about her stance on Israel, which of course is terribly relevant because historically, along with the President and his cabinet, the Mayor of Los Angeles has always helped make a lot of the decisions concerning Israel.
Jewish vote could be key to Los Angeles mayor’s race [Southern California Public Radio]
Stanley Fischer is widely credited with keeping Israel’s economy afloat
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.