Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another


Gabrielle Giffords Launches Gun Control Effort

Two years after a vicious attack, a new campaign begins

Print Email
Gabrielle Giffords(Arizona Republic)

On the second anniversary of the horrific Tuscon shooting, in which six people were killed and 13 were injured, then-Congresswoman Gabrille Giffords among them, the former lawmaker is starting an initiative with her husband, former astronaut Mark Kelly, to counter the influence of the gun lobby.

The new initiative will push for background checks for private gun sales and look at ways to better address mental illness, among other efforts, Kelly told ABC.

Gifford’s group aims to take on the National Rifle Association, which in 2011 spent over 11 times more on lobbying than all gun control lobbyists combined.

The new group has set up a political action committee to raise funds “to balance the influence of the gun lobby,” it said on its website,

“Until now, the gun lobby’s political contributions, advertising and lobbying have dwarfed spending from anti-gun violence groups. No longer,” Giffords wrote in an opinion piece published Tuesday in USA Today.

As the issue of gun control remains in the spotlight in the wake of last month’s shooting, here are a few of our most recent features on the topic.

Liel Leibovitz wrote on why the United States should emulate Israel’s gun culture and not its laws.

Michael Monyihan was righteous in his indignation about the invocation of the Holocaust by guns-rights activists.

Rabbi Marc Katz looks to Jewish texts and asks what Judaism says about weapons.

Former lawmaker Giffords launches gun control drive [Reuters]

Print Email

Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

Klara Alex says:

Thank you Gabi. This is what courage and public service is allabout.

PhillipNagle says:

How about the same level of control on voter registration. The ones who are pushing hardest for a national registry of gun owners (liberals) are the same one ones who oppose picture ID’s for voters. Do you smell the hypocracy.

    One is a much larger problem. There are 30,000 gun deaths every year in the US, including 10,000 murders. On the other hand, there are estimated to be less than 10 cases of voter fraud in the US each election cycle. With voter registration laws as the republicans wanted, the poor and students (i.e. Democrats) would be dis-proportionally disenfranchised, while everyone would be subject to gun laws.

      PhillipNagle says:

      Wrong ! In Minnesotta they couldn’t find a trace of several thousand “same day registered ” voters. The “less than ten cases of voter fraud” is an out and out lie. Actually voter ID laws apply to everyone and students have ID’s from their schools and people on welfare have state issued ID. The case for anyone being disenfranchised was false propaganda by those who wanted to cheat in elections (ie Democrats). While everyone would be subject to gun laws, they would only affect gun owners, which should make no difference .


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

Gabrielle Giffords Launches Gun Control Effort

Two years after a vicious attack, a new campaign begins

More on Tablet:

Embracing Wisdom and Folly

By MaNishtana — Should we continue to revere the works of Jewish leaders who act wrongfully?