Was Bibi Going to Give the Golan Back to Syria?
An October surprise with some curious timing
The Israeli election season, which kicked off about 15 minutes ago, had its first jolt when a report released by Yedioth Ahronoth claimed that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu agreed in principle to deal the Golan Heights to Syria in exchange for peace during indirect talks back in 2010. The report cites U.S. documents:
The pertinent documents were written by Special Coordinator for the Middle East Frederick Hoff, an assistant to the then-US Special Envoy for the Middle East George Mitchell.
The paper reported that Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak opened secret negotiations with Assad over a full withdrawal from the Golan to the shores of the Sea of Galilee in exchange for a peace deal. Israel captured the Golan Heights from Syria during the Six-Day War in 1967.
Netanyahu had Israeli officials who were involved in the negotiations sign confidentiality agreements, according to Yedioth, in order to guard the secrecy of the talks, of which the rest of the Israeli government was apparently unaware. The negotiations reportedly ended in early 2011, with the outbreak of the popular uprising against the Assad regime.
Unsurprisingly, the Prime Minister’s Office has denied the story. Nevertheless, with the campaign season kicking off, a report about an initiative to make peace with Syria–at the expense of the Golan Heights no less–is a surprising development. If there’s truth to the story, it sheds some light on Netanyahu’s willingness to make a deal and concede highly strategic land, puts American peacemaking efforts into a context, and perhaps give some now-useless insight into the mind of Syrian President Bashar Assad.
Report Claims Netanyahu Agreed to Withdraw from Golan Heights [Times of Israel]
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.