Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another


NYC Panel to Regulate Circumcision Rite

Consent forms will be required for ‘metzitzah b’peh’

Print Email
Mayor Bloomberg in 2012(NYDN)

The New York City board of health has unanimously passed a regulation requiring that parents sign a consent form before the circumcision practice known as metzitzah b’peh can be carried out by a mohel. The rite, in which the mohel uses his mouth to remove blood from the incision, is a prevalent custom in some ultra-Orthodox communities.

In recent years, the practice has come under fire from doctors and health officials.

Infectious disease experts widely agree that the oral contact creates a risk of transmission of herpes that can be deadly to infants, because of their underdeveloped immune systems. Between 2004 and 2011, the city learned of 11 herpes infections it said were most likely caused by the practice. Two of those babies died; at least two others suffered brain damage.

In recent months, rabbis, citing infringement on religious practice, have threatened to sue the city if measures against the rite are enacted. On the other side of the issue, a number of medical professionals have spoken out heatedly against the practice being allowed at all. After the measure passed (which has seemingly toothless penalties), one of the panel members, Dr. Joel A. Forman said that “it’s crazy that we allow this to go on.”

In many ways, this measure is a happy medium between allowing a controversial religious custom to continue unfettered and banishing the practice altogether. As expected, neither side is happy though.

Earlier: And Now Back to American Circumcision
Health Board Votes to Regulate Jewish Circumcision Ritual [NYT]

Print Email

Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

The mayor with a Wiener. Very classy.

Any religious practice which threatens the lives of babies should be banned regardless of the religion. Especially one which isn’t a obligation and has such weak religious support such as metzitzah b’peh.

This story reminds me of the great “grape juice” controversy. Some US rabbis were caught taking advantage of the prohibition era to sell letters allowing their “congregants” to buy wine for “ritual purposes”. When the affair was splashed across the front page of the New York Times, the rabbis at JTS suggested that the whole problem could be avoided by replacing kiddush wine with grape juice. For a number of years, the issue of whether grape juice could be used for kiddush became a major dividing line between groups in American Jewry. The ultra-Orthodox opposed it, sometimes writing as if kiddush on grape juice was only slightly less problematic than idol worship. I have never found anyone in today’s Orthodox community who has heard of the controversy, excepting a few professional historians.

Michael Cohen says:

In Jerusalem, I made a video of the complete circumcision (brit milah), including the controversial metzitazah b’peh – which has been substituted by the pipette in the less traditional brit milah. Personally, I feel that the chances of infection are minimal with the oral method, compared with riskier endeavors like walking across the street.
(“The Circumcision of Jacob Chai)

I think it’s a brilliant, almost Talmudic, win/win. I live in Ohio. I have friends who had a baby boy last fall and couldn’t find a mohel who would not do the brit milah without this, what they (and I) consider barbaric practice. I’m over 60 and had never heard of such a thing until their baby was born. They found a way to do the brit, but it took a lot of doing and it took a lot of work to make it happen. Parents should know what the mohel is planning to do and consent to it, just as they consent to the circumscision itself.

Michael Cohen says:

Demystifying circumcision. Some videos on circumcision I made here in Israel.
Two methods of oral suction:
Traditional brit milah ceremony (includes metzitzah b’peh – direct suction):
People-on-the-street interviews in Jerusalem, discussing whether circumcision should be banned or not: “Huna” “Rocio”


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

NYC Panel to Regulate Circumcision Rite

Consent forms will be required for ‘metzitzah b’peh’

More on Tablet:

A Tale of Three Twitter Feeds: Hamas Tweets in Arabic, English, and Hebrew

By Aaron Magid — Analysis of the social-media messaging of Hamas’ military wing reveals distinct voices for the West, the Arab Middle East, and Israel