Holocaust Gaffes Are A Bipartisan Habit
A busy week in Holocaust misappropriation
In his inaugural column, our Righteous Gentile Michael C. Monyihan wrote about the surge of Hitler-themed debate points on the campaign trail and in the media.
An update on one of the stories: Roscoe Bartlett–a Republican representative from Maryland–has apologized for a comment he made earlier this week comparing federal student loans–which Bartlett deems unconstitutional–to the “slippery slope” in Germany that ultimately led to the Holocaust.
“Not that it’s not a good idea to give students loans; it certainly is a good idea to give them loans,” Bartlett said. “But if you can ignore the Constitution to do something good today, tomorrow you will be ignoring the Constitution to do something bad. You could. There are more people in our, in America today of German ancestry than any other [inaudible]. The Holocaust that occurred in Germany — how in the heck could that happen? And when you start down the wrong road, it can be a very slippery slope.”
Another example from earlier this week was John Burton, Chair of the California Democratic Party, compared the speeches given at the Republican National Convention (with special emphasis on VP-hopeful Paul Ryan) to the work of Joseph Goebbels, the infamous Nazi propagandist.
“They lie and they don’t care if people think they lie… [Nazi Germany’s Propaganda Minister] Joseph Goebbels – it’s the big lie, you keep repeating it.”
Burton eventually apologized. As Monyihan points out, this is “yet another example of the triumph of crudity in American political discourse.”
Related: Hitler on the Campaign Trail [Tablet Magazine]
Bartlett Calls Federal Loans Unconstitutional, Invokes Holocaust [WaPo]
Republicans Condemn Goebbels Comment by California Democratic Party Chair [Times of Israel]
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.