Mormons Steal the Show at RNC’s Final Night
Forget Clint Eastwood’s surreal speech.
If you watched the Republican National Convention last night, or scanned the reports about it this morning, you’ve probably heard a lot about Clint Eastwood’s truly surreal speech, which took the form of an unscripted dialogue with an empty chair representing President Obama. It was quite a spectacle—but far, far less affecting than the speakers that didn’t make it into prime time. That’s because for the first time this campaign, the Romney team brought his Mormonism out of the closet.
It was a turning point not just for Mitt Romney, but for Mormonism on the public stage. Until now, worried about conservative Christian mistrust and opportunistic partisan mockery, the campaign had studiously avoided the subject, instructing surrogates not to cooperate with the media on it. Romney would run for president while essentially running away from his religious beliefs.
But that began to change in the run-up to the convention, apparently at Romney’s insistence. On Aug. 19, the campaign allowed the press to join Romney in church. And on Thursday, the final night of the RNC, Romney’s faith finally took center stage.
First, Grant Bennett, who served as Romney’s assistant during his time as an LDS bishop, described the candidate’s unstinting devotion to his congregation. (To explain the character of the position to a wider audience, Bennett used the term “pastor” rather than “bishop,” which has different connotations to non-Mormons.)
“The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has an unpaid, lay clergy,” opened Bennett. “While raising his family and pursuing his career, Mitt Romney served in our church, devoting 10, 15, even 20 hours a week doing so. Like all Mormon leaders, he did so on his own time and at his own expense.”
Quoting generously from scripture, Bennett elaborated on Romney’s role: “Mitt prayed with and counseled church members seeking spiritual direction, single mothers raising children, couples with marital problems, youth with addictions, immigrants separated from their families, and individuals whose heat had been shut off.”
These words laid the groundwork for the next two speeches from members of Romney’s Massachusetts congregation, which were unquestionably the most moving of the entire convention. Ted and Pat Oparowski recalled how Bishop Romney befriended their 14-year-old son David, who was dying of Hodgkin’s Disease, helping him draft a will and ultimately delivering his eulogy.
Pam Finlayson recounted how Ann and Mitt Romney welcomed her family to their town and supported them during the difficult illness of her young daughter, Kate. “I will never forget that when he looked down tenderly at my daughter, his eyes filled with tears, and he reached out gently and stroked her tiny back,” she said. “I could tell immediately that he didn’t just see a tangle of plastic and tubes; he saw our beautiful little girl, and he was clearly overcome with compassion for her.”
For a candidate frequently criticized as distant and out-of-touch, these moving testimonials were particularly powerful. Taken together, they suggest that one reason Romney has failed to connect with voters is that he has until now cordoned off one of the deepest aspects of his character—his faith. By the time these speeches were over, pundits had largely forgotten all of the reasons they’d advised Romney to avoid his religion. As one put it, “Seriously, why do you put Eastwood in prime time and not these people?” Judging by that reaction, we can probably expect much more Mormonism in the campaign to come.
Of course, Americans do not simply elect a president based on their moral character. But what these stories of Romney’s Mormon piety have accomplished, is to mainstream the Mormon religion on primetime television. For a young religion that was kept under wraps for months as a political liability, that is quite an accomplishment. Even if Romney loses, public acceptance of Mormonism may turn out to be the lasting legacy of this election.
Related: Protocols of the Elders [Tablet Magazine]
How disparate stories out of Germany this week are linked
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.