Aly Raisman Gets Robbed of the Bronze
Labyrinthine Olympic tiebreaker rules deprive Raisman of third place
She vaulted and floor-exercised her way into our hearts. For a moment, she made “Hava Nagila” slightly cool. Sadly, Aly Raisman’s dreams of her own Olympic gold were dashed tonight when she finished tied for a third place with (the unbelievably not-Jewish) Aliya Mustafina of Russia in the women’s all-around individual competition.
By Olympic protocol, Raisman was not granted the bronze medal because she
is Jewish did not win out in the series of determining tiebreakers. Both gymnasts were tied with a score of 59.566 points when these nutso rules went into effect:
Should there be ties in the team finals in London, the lowest apparatus score will be dropped and the remaining scores added. If that doesn’t break the tie, additional apparatus scores will be dropped, one at a time, until there is a winner. If no winner emerges, the tie stands.
There is a similar formula for the all-around final. But if no winner has emerged following the dropping of apparatus scores, the execution score total for each gymnast serve as the tie-breaker, followed by his or her total start value. If that doesn’t establish a winner, the tie will stand.
The site SB Nation broke down an explanation of the loss thusly:
So Mustafina’s lowest score (a 13.633 on the balance beam) and Raisman’s lowest score (a 14.200 on the balance beam) were both dropped, and the scores remaining were compared. Mustafina had a 45.933 after the drop, and Raisman had a 45.366; therefore, Mustafina won the tiebreaker.
What seems wrong about this is that Raisman’s lowest score was better than Mustafina’s lowest score. If this is an all-around competition, shouldn’t the standard for winning be consistency? At any rate, Mustafina may have the bronze, but she got straight up crushed by Raisman’s teammate Gabby Douglas who won the gold.
Raisman wins the gold in our hearts.
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.