Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another


An Israeli Coalition Against Fur

A Knesset bill that underscores the best of Israel

Print Email

For many people, Israel is an easy place to be disenchanted by. However, every once and a while, a story—even a small one—emerges that highlights the best of the country and its possibilities. Take, for example, a story in the Jerusalem Post yesterday about a Knesset bill that would forbid the sale of fur in Israel. Here are the great things about this bill:

The most salient part is that it’s inclusive: The law would still allow the sale of fur needed for science as well as for traditional use—meaning fur could used to make the shtreimels that haredi men wear to express their religious identity and follow their customs. Previous versions of the bill failed because it didn’t make provisions for shtreimels.

The second positive is the coalition involved in the creation of the bill:

The bill, drafted by MK Ronit Tirosh (Kadima) in conjunction with the Israel-based International Anti-Fur Coalition, received the support of eight Knesset members from across the political spectrum—Tirosh, Eitan Cabel (Labor), Nitzan Horowitz (Meretz), Yoel Hasson (Kadima), Dov Henin (Hadash), Miri Regev (Likud), Nino Abesadze (Kadima) and Masud Ganaim (United Arab List).

That’s eight different parties that might never agree on anything else, coming together to work on something they all believe in.

The tertiary bonus (when does one ever get a good chance to use the word tertiary?) is that the law would result in the application of Jewish values into society in a way that is meaningful.

The text of the bill explains that there is no longer any necessity for fur, as synthetic fabrics heat much more efficiently, and fur is now simply a fashion item and status symbol. A ban on the sale of fur within Israel would provide animals protection according to the Animal Welfare Law, and would be in accordance with the values of human compassion and Judaism, the bill text says.

The fourth positive thing is that, if passed (and considering the provisions), Israel would be the first country in the world to ban fur. While there have citywide bans before, no country has ever banned the sale of fur.

And the fifth good thing is that it’s way too hot in that part of the world to rationally wear fur and, accordingly, anything that might tamp down the instability over there would be welcomed. Let’s just hope it passes.

Bill to ban fur sales, except for shtreimels, science [JPost]

Print Email

Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

doudie kay says:

More Israeli B”S. Dont the liberals there have better things to do than ban FUR in a tropical type country. THey might as well ban longjohns… As far as the frummies, if they want to schvitaz under mink let them… But to ban fur…. Stupidity

It is a damn shame that the Knesset is as PC as the anti-fur movement in the states. Furriers were in many cases Jewish and were contributors to many Jewish charities. It is telling that the picture used was a lion, rather than an animal raised for it’s fur. I guess the Knesset will be walking around in cloth shoes, or do they understand that leather is the “fur” of a cow? Don’t wear any lambskin gloves. This is extremism at it’s worst.

Three corrections are in order:
1. “Tertiary” may be fun to use, but it doesn’t mean “third;” it means third in importance.
2. All Israel is hot in the summer but Jerusalem is cold in the winter, as is most of Israel.
3. The writer seems to believe that exempting shtreimels from the ban is self-evident. But why allow fur shtreimels? The Torah and the Talmud make no mention of them. They come from “chukat ha-goy”–imitating popular (non-Jewish) culture and, for that reason, halacha itself would ban them. But forget halacha. They’re what princes in Poland wore and so, when Polish Jews, unwilling to adapt their culture to new lands (such as Israel or Brooklyn), became free to be “princes,” that’s what they chose to wear on their heads. Hardly a justification for using fur if fur is to be banned for reasons of animal cruelty.


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

An Israeli Coalition Against Fur

A Knesset bill that underscores the best of Israel

More on Tablet:

How To Make Middle Eastern Stuffed Vegetables

By Joan Nathan — Video: Filled with warm rice and unexpected spices, they’re perfect for a cool autumn night—as a side dish or vegetarian entree