German Parliament Rejects Compulsory Turtlenecks
German public opinion is ‘split’
On Friday, with a headline and art for the ages (see above), Spiegel reported that the German parliament passed a resolution in support of circumcision. The resolution promises that the government will draft a law in the fall that “guarantees that the circumcision of boys, carried out with medical expertise and without unnecessary pain, is permitted.”
Despite being non-binding in its nature, the swiftly-passed resolution was meant to send a message to religious and political groups in Germany and abroad, namely that June’s extremely controversial regional court ruling in Cologne that banned circumcision will not stand. Germany is home to 100,000 Jews and 4 million Muslims.
There is definitely some opposition to the Bundstag’s resolution. The head of the seemingly paradoxically-named Federation of German Criminal Police (BDK) stated its displeasure thusly:
“The freedom of parents to practice religion will nevertheless be limited by a child’s more important right to physical integrity.”
Other groups, citing the medical complications that arise in 10% of circumcisions, called for a two-year moratorium on new laws to have the issue debated by experts. But perhaps most interesting of all is a poll that shows how divided German public opinion is on the matter of circumcision.
A survey conducted this week by pollster YouGov for the German news agency DPA found that 45 percent of Germans support a ban on circumcision of boys, whereas 42 percent were opposed to it and 13 percent undecided. Fifty-five percent said they did not believe a national ban on circumcision would damage Germany’s image abroad, compared to 33 percent who thought it would.
More news to come when the colder weather arrives.
Politicians Greet German Parliament Resolution Supporting Circumcision [Spiegel]
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.