Arabs Must Step Up
Clinton says in Council on Foreign Relations address
In her first major policy address as Secretary of State, delivered this afternoon at the Council of Foreign Relations in Washington, Hillary Clinton refused to name a deadline for a peace deal between the Israelis and the Palestinians—sidestepping the inevitable countdown that became a bete noir for her predecessor—but put the onus on Arab states to make an agreement happen soon. “We don’t think it is just the responsibility of the Israelis, or just of the Palestinians,” she said in response to a question after her address. The Obama administration expects action from Israel, she said, but it is depending on backup from Arab states in the form of “providing support to the Palestinians and offering a concrete opening, however modest, to the Israelis.”
Clinton referred to the examples of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat and King Hussein of Jordan in asking for help mobilizing “peace constituencies” and acting against cultures of “hate, intolerance and disrespect.” She also held out the example of the Saudi peace plan, which she noted has been supported by more than 20 nations. What she did not add was that the plan was endorsed by the Arab League after an amendment was added demanding the right of return for Palestinian refugees, something Israeli leaders—including centrist opposition leader Tzipi Livni—have dismissed out of hand. And it doesn’t help that Saudi Arabia’s Prince Turki al-Faisal said categorically in New York earlier this year that King Abdullah, who sponsored the peace proposal, “is not going to go to Jerusalem.”
But Clinton’s target audience might really have been the Israelis. Aside from not laying out any demands on the Netanyahu government, she explicitly committed herself to jump-starting bilateral negotiations—and, after months of opacity, to excluding Hamas from the picture. “We would expect Hamas to recognize Israel, renounce violence, and abide by prior agreements,” she said. “Rejectionism and resistance hasn’t really given them or their children the kind of future they would hope for. … There are certain entry requirements that have to be paid.” And, on a different note, she said that while the U.S. was going to continue offering engagement to the Iranians, she defended it as a strategic effort to rally allies for any eventual action to prevent a nuclear Islamic Republic.
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.