Rabin’s Assassin Departs Solitary
Gets a taste for the rule of law he so despised
Yesterday was Independence Day. Today, we ought to toast freedom of another sort, the release from solitary confinement of Yitzhak Rabin’s assassin, Yigal Amir.
Let there be no mistake: Amir is murderous scum, an unrepentant zealot deserving of the sternest punishment. In Israel, that punishment is life in prison, to which Amir was sentenced after shooting the prime minister in 1995. That was 17 years ago. Since then, Amir has been locked up alone in his cell, not permitted to walk the yard or talk to fellow inmates. Allow him these basic minimal rights, argued many, and he might incite other prisoners.
It’s a preposterous argument. Amir is a lone gunman, a fanatic who was driven to act by some heady combination of hormones and religion and rage. Arguing that he poses any further threat when behind bars is like arguing that Mark David Chapman, John Lennon’s assassin, might, if allowed to associate with other prisoners, influence a murderous killing spree targeting the world’s rock stars.
And yet, Amir spent nearly two decades in seclusion. Unless a prisoner is highly violent and poses a threat to others, such punishment atop punishment is reprehensible. In his actions, Yigal Amir sought to gun down not only Rabin but also the democratic state of Israel. There’s no more fitting response than to show this lowlife that, to his chagrin, respect for civil rights and the rule of law, however embattled these days, still prevails.
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.