An evacuation clash reveals intra-settler fault lines
Yesterday, the Israeli government began evacuating 33 families from illegal homes in the settlement neighborhood of Givat Ulpana. Earlier, the Israeli Supreme Court had ordered that these buildings be dismantled by July 1, and Prime Minister Netanyahu had vowed to uphold the ruling, going so far as to threaten to fire any government ministers who voted for legislation to retroactively legalize the homes.
In a classic Netanyahu balancing act, he mollified the evicted settlers by promising to build 300 new housing units in another part of the settlement deemed legal by the Supreme Court. This agreement in hand, the residents of the Ulpana homes agreed to leave peacefully.
Thus, when the day of eviction arrived, settler media like Arutz 7 published “Pictures of Quiet Eviction,” depicting a relaxed, orderly transition.
But while there were no clashes between soldiers and settlers, there were violent altercations on the ground–between the majority of the settlers and a few who attempted to resist the evacuation. According to the local outlet Hakol Hayehudi (“The Jewish Voice”), infighting broke out when one family and some youths barricaded themselves inside the buildings, threatening to derail the otherwise uneventful transition.
In response, some local residents along with teenagers from elsewhere in Beit El attacked the family, beating the husband and stripping the religious hair covering from his wife.
These sort of clashes rarely make it into the mainstream press, but they reveal important fault lines within the settler community. Settlers are often painted with an unhelpfully broad brush in the American and international media, as though all think alike and hew to the same political commitments (usually nefarious ones). As incidents like these remind us, there many kinds of settlers: religious settlers and secular settlers, settlers willing to work with the government and those who view it as illegitimate, and shades in between.
As creative peace-building NGOs like Blue & White Future note, understanding these distinctions between types of settlers is crucial for crafting a workable peace plan amenable to as many Israelis as possible. Offered the right compensation package from the government, many settlers may be willing to move to Israel proper, or to settlement areas that will be annexed by Israel in a peace deal. Others may resist any attempts at evacuation. But without treating settlers like the ideologically diverse group that they are, no peace proposition has any real chance of succeeding.
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.